Joint associations of handgrip strength and chair-stand performance with motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults

Clicks: 3
ID: 338172
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #174 of 175 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 175 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motor dysfunction is associated with cognitive vulnerability, but whether impairments across body regions jointly contribute to motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) remains unclear. We examined the independent and joint associations of handgrip strength and chair-stand test (CST) with MCR. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 6258 dementia-free older adults (mean age 71.5 ± 6.6 years; 63.1% women) from a community-based cohort. Handgrip strength and CST performance were used to define upper- and lower-extremity motor impairment. Participants were classified as normal, handgrip weakness only, CST impairment only, or combined motor impairment. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. Additive and multiplicative interactions were assessed. RESULTS: MCR was present in 10.4% of participants. Using the A/B CST cutoff as the primary definition, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for MCR, compared with normal function, were 1.84 (1.14-2.97) for handgrip weakness only, 4.17 (2.97-5.85) for CST impairment only, and 9.17 (6.56-12.81) for combined motor impairment. Associations were directionally consistent across alternative CST cutoffs. A positive additive interaction was observed at the A/B CST cutoff (relative excess risk due to interaction = 3.48; attributable proportion = 0.40; and synergy index = 1.83), whereas multiplicative interaction was not positive. CONCLUSIONS: Combined handgrip weakness and poorer CST performance were strongly associated with prevalent MCR. A positive additive interaction at the primary CST cutoff suggests that joint motor impairment may help characterize MCR-related vulnerability in older adults.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225097581 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gerona/glag254
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.