world journal of gastroenterology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6017 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

world journal of gastroenterology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name world j gastroenterol
Abbreviated Name world j gastroenterol
ISSN 2219-2840
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2014
Inflammatory colonic carcinogenesis: a review on pathogenesis and immunosurveillance mechanisms in ulcerative colitis
Scarpa M;Castagliuolo I;Castoro C;Pozza A;Scarpa M;Kotsafti A;Angriman I;;
Vol. 20 , No. 22 , pp. -
405 views Abstract
2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment.
Gómez-Aldana, Andrés;Jaramillo-Santos, Mario;Delgado, Andrés;Jaramillo, Carlos;Lúquez-Mindiola, Adán;
Vol. 25 , No. 32 , pp. 4598-4613
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hepatic senescence, the good and the bad.
Huda, Nazmul;Liu, Gang;Hong, Honghai;Yan, Shengmin;Khambu, Bilon;Yin, Xiao-Ming;
Vol. 25 , No. 34 , pp. 5069-5081
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chronic pancreatitis and the heart disease: Still terra incognita?
Nikolic, Sara;Dugic, Ana;Steiner, Corinna;Tsolakis, Apostolos V;Haugen Löfman, Ida Marie;Löhr, J-Matthias;Vujasinovic, Miroslav;
Vol. 25 , No. 44 , pp. 6561-6570
341 views DOI Abstract
2015
Associations of sense of coherence with psychological distress and quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease
Freitas TH;Andreoulakis E;Alves GS;Miranda HL;Braga LL;Hyphantis T;Carvalho AF;;
Vol. 21 , No. 21 , pp. -
335 views Abstract
2019
Colorectal cancer screening from 45 years of age: Thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
Mannucci, Alessandro;Zuppardo, Raffaella Alessia;Rosati, Riccardo;Leo, Milena Di;Perea, José;Cavestro, Giulia Martina;
Vol. 25 , No. 21 , pp. 2565-2580
330 views DOI Abstract
2014
Cytokines, cytokine gene polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection: friend or foe?
Figueiredo, Camila A;Marques, Cintia Rodrigues;Costa, Ryan dos Santos;da Silva, Hugo Bernardino F;Alcantara-Neves, Neuza M;
Vol. 20 , No. 18 , pp. 5235-43
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome
Qin HY;Cheng CW;Tang XD;Bian ZX;;
Vol. 20 , No. 39 , pp. -
319 views Abstract
2019
Extract of Cycas revoluta Thunb. Enhances the inhibitory effect of 5-fluorouracil on gastric cancer cells through the AKT-mTOR pathway
Cui, X.
Vol. 25 , pp. 1854-1864
313 views DOI
2019
Timing, distribution, and microbiology of infectious complications after necrotizing pancreatitis
Lu, J.
Vol. 25 , pp. 5162-5173
302 views DOI
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.