accounts of chemical research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#107 / 33,718
πŸ“‰ Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

accounts of chemical research

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name acc chem res
Abbreviated Name acc chem res
ISSN 1520-4898
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (1131 total)

2009
Recent Advances in Sensitized Mesoscopic Solar Cells
MichaΓ«l GrΓ€tzel
2,638 views DOI
2013
gone in a flash: manipulation of audiovisual temporal integration using transcranial magnetic stimulation
;Roy eHamilton;Roy eHamilton;Martin eWiener;Martin eWiener;Daniel eDrebing;Daniel eDrebing;Branch eCoslett;Branch eCoslett;Branch eCoslett
Vol. 4 , pp. -
723 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hoodwinking Cytochrome P450BM3 into Hydroxylating Non-Native Substrates by Exploiting Its Substrate Misrecognition.
Shoji, Osami;Aiba, Yuichiro;Watanabe, Yoshihito;
Vol. 52 , No. 4 , pp. 925-934
689 views DOI Abstract
2016
Acidic Properties and Structure-Activity Correlations of Solid Acid Catalysts Revealed by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy.
Zheng, Anmin;Li, Shenhui;Liu, Shang-Bin;Deng, Feng;
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 655-63
568 views DOI Abstract
2016
mothers and fathers with binge eating disorder and their 18-36 months old children: a longitudinal study on parent-infant interactions and offspring’s emotional-behavioral profiles.
;Silvia eCimino;Luca eCerniglia;Alessio ePorreca;Alessandra eSimonelli;Lucia eRonconi;Giulia eBallarotto
Vol. 7 , pp. -
517 views DOI Abstract
2015
the reciprocal relationship between compounding awareness and vocabulary knowledge in chinese: a latent growth model study
;Yahua eCheng;Liping eLi;Xinchun eWu
Vol. 6 , pp. -
462 views DOI Abstract
2013
design and evaluation of the computer-based training program calcularis for enhancing numerical cognition
;Tanja eKΓ€ser;Gian-Marco eBaschera;Juliane eKohn;Karin eKucian;Karin eKucian;Verena eRichtmann;Ursina eGrond;Ursina eGrond;Markus eGross;Michael evon Aster;Michael evon Aster;Michael evon Aster
Vol. 4 , pp. -
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
From Palladium to Gold Catalysis for the Synthesis of Crushed Fullerenes and Acenes.
Dorel, Ruth;Echavarren, Antonio M;
418 views DOI Abstract
2010
Interplay between theory and experiment: Computational organometallic and transition metal chemistry
Lin Z.
Vol. 43 , pp. 602-611
407 views DOI
2018
the socio-communicative development of preterm infants is resistant to the negative effects of parity on maternal responsiveness
;Ivete F. R. Caldas;Marilice F. Garotti;Victor K. M. Shiramizu;Antonio Pereira;Antonio Pereira
Vol. 9 , pp. -
396 views DOI Abstract
View All 1,131 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.