Indexed in Journament

beilstein journal of nanotechnology

ISSN 2190-4286· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,275 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 41.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Краткое название beilstein j nanotechnol
Сокращённое название beilstein journal of nanotechnology
ISSN 2190-4286
URL http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/home/home.htm

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 62.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for beilstein journal of nanotechnology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 7.9 11.5
Content Distribution 62.7 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2018
Metal-free catalysis based on nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials: a photoelectron spectroscopy point of view
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 2015-2031
507 views Abstract
2015
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of graphitic carbon nanomaterials doped with heteroatoms
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 177-192
475 views Abstract
2019
Playing with covalent triazine framework tiles for improved CO2 adsorption properties and catalytic performance
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1217-1227
461 views Abstract
2018
Electrolyte tuning in dye-sensitized solar cells with N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) iron(II) sensitizers
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 3069-3078
455 views Abstract
2017
Involvement of two uptake mechanisms of gold and iron oxide nanoparticles in a co-exposure scenario using mouse macrophages
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 2396-2409
447 views Abstract
2019
A novel method to remove impulse noise from atomic force microscopy images based on Bayesian compressed sensing.
Vol. 10 , pp. 2346-2356
410 views DOI Abstract
2016
Hydrophilic silver nanoparticles with tunable optical properties: application for the detection of heavy metals in water
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1654-1661
392 views Abstract
2016
Precise in situ etch depth control of multilayered III−V semiconductor samples with reflectance anisotropy spectroscopy (RAS) equipment
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1783-1793
363 views Abstract
2012
Theoretical study of the frequency shift in bimodal FM-AFM by fractional calculus
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 198-206
363 views Abstract
2020
3D superconducting hollow nanowires with tailored diameters grown by focused He + beam direct writing
Vol. 11 , pp. -
226 views Abstract
2020
3D superconducting hollow nanowires with tailored diameters grown by focused He+ beam direct writing
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1198-1206
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of fresh and aged lithium iron phosphate cathodes using a tailored electrochemical strain microscopy technique.
Vol. 11 , pp. 583-596
274 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nanosecond resistive switching in Ag/AgI/PtIr nanojunctions.
Vol. 11 , pp. 92-100
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization and performance of nitrogen-doped carbon dots as a color conversion layer for white-LED applications
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 2004-2013
210 views Abstract
2019
A novel method to remove impulse noise from atomic force microscopy images based on Bayesian compressed sensing.
Vol. 10 , pp. 2346-2356
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Label-free highly sensitive probe detection with novel hierarchical SERS substrates fabricated by nanoindentation and chemical reaction methods
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 2483-2496
270 views Abstract
2019
Precise local control of liquid crystal pretilt on polymer layers by focused ion beam nanopatterning.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1691-1697
229 views DOI Abstract
2019
BiOCl/TiO/diatomite composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1412-1422
256 views DOI Abstract
2019
Direct observation of oxygen-vacancy formation and structural changes in BiWO nanoflakes induced by electron irradiation.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1434-1442
299 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,275 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.