Indexed in Journament

environmental technology

ISSN 1479-487X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,967 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
98 Articles
Scores higher than 69.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name environ technol
Abbreviated Name environ technol
ISSN 1479-487X
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tent20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for environmental technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 66.7 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 6.4 13.4
Content Distribution 70.3 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (98)

2015
2015
2015
syncope in non-massive pulmonary embolism as a predictor of high-risk mortality
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 158-162
453 views DOI Abstract
2015
the assessment of effects of combined therapy with mildronate on lipid profile, inflammatory factors and endothelium function in patients with ischemic heart disease
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 10-14
442 views DOI Abstract
2005
External Capillary Condensation and Adsorption of VOCs onto Activated Carbon Fiber Cloth and Felt
Vol. 26 , No. 11 , pp. 1277-1288
437 views DOI
2019
2020
Effect of photocatalysis (TiO /UV) on the inactivation and inhibition of virulence factors expression.
, pp. 1-19
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Isothermal drying kinetics of sewage sludge using weathered coal fly ash as adjuvant for agronomic application.
, pp. 1-11
388 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of photocatalysis (TiO /UV) on the inactivation and inhibition of virulence factors expression.
, pp. 1-19
404 views DOI Abstract
2020
Removal of 17α-ethinylestradiol and caffeine from wastewater by UASB-Fenton coupled system.
, pp. 1-37
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Efficient removal of cytotoxic drugs from wastewater by single-stage combined photocatalysis-algae treatment process.
, pp. 1-13
252 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biosorption mechanisms of cationic and anionic dyes in a low-cost residue from brewer's spent grain.
, pp. 1-16
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
Use of for controlling phosphorus contamination in anthropogenic wetland ecosystems.
, pp. 1-33
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Moringa oleifera seed extracts to polish effluents from natural systems treating faecal sludge.
Vol. 40 , No. 15 , pp. 2018-2026
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Study on the mechanical properties of flax fiber-reinforced silty clay contaminated by zinc-ion solution.
, pp. 1-13
244 views DOI Abstract
2019
Isothermal drying kinetics of sewage sludge using weathered coal fly ash as adjuvant for agronomic application.
, pp. 1-11
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of Ecological Vulnerability of Resource-based Cities Based on Entropy-Set Pair Analysis.
, pp. 1-22
251 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,967 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.