syncope in non-massive pulmonary embolism as a predictor of high-risk mortality

Clicks: 454
ID: 259377
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 98 articles by views in environmental technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

Aim. To study the prognostic value of syncope in non-massive pulmonary embolism (PE). Material and methods. Patients (n=64; 35 men and 29 women; aged 52±13 years) with non-massive PE were examined. 13 (20%) patients had a high risk of death according to the ESC criteria, and 51 (80%) — an intermediate risk. PE diagnosis was verified by X-ray contrast angiography or computer angiography of the pulmonary artery. Patients were split into 2 groups: patients of group 1 (n=14) had syncope episodes during the last 24 hours (from 1 to 30), and group 2 (n=50) — did not have. Groups did not differ by age, sex and disease duration. Comparative analysis of clinical and instrumental data, hospital mortality was made. Results. The significant differences for most parameters in the studied groups were not found. Combination of syncope and right bundle branch block on ECG was observed more often in PE patients of high risk mortality: 50% vs 14.2% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.004). High risk of death was defined 3 times more often in group 1 than this in group 2: 42.8% vs 14% (p=0.017). Syncope at the onset of non-massive PE clinical manifestations associated with more often hypotension development — 42.8% vs 14% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.017). Patients of group 1 needed in thrombolytic therapy 3 times more often than patients of group 2: 50% vs 16%, respectively. Hospital mortality did not differ significantly — 0 and 2% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion. Syncope in non-massive PE, especially in combination with right bundle branch block on ECG, may be considered as a possible criterion for high risk of complications and can be rationale for thrombolytic therapy in addition to standard therapy. Designed studies on prognostic significance of syncope in PE, depending on mass of pulmonary artery lesions and risk stratification are necessary.

Reference Key
kurakina2015racionalnasyncope Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;E. A. Kurakina;D. V. Duplyakov;S. M. Khokhlunov;G. S. Kozupitsa
Journal environmental technology
Year 2015
DOI
10.1234/1819-6446-2012-2-158-162
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.