Indexed in Journament

south african journal of business management

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,228 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 13.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name south african journal of business management
Abbreviated Name south african journal of business management

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.3
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 11.1
Innovation 13.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 69.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 26.3
Innovation 13.5 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.3
Content Distribution 69.2 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2004
The in-store shopping experience: A comparative study of supermarket and clothing store customers
Terblanche, N. S.;Boshoff, C.;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 1-10
409 views Abstract
2013
International tourists’ perceptions of crime-risk and their future travel intentions during the 2010 FIFA World Cup™ in South Africa
George, R,;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 47-60
407 views Abstract
2008
The drivers influencing the relationship between sales representatives and customers and the impact this relationship has on sales volume within Coca-Cola’s Western Cape region
Herbst, F. J.;Forrest, C. L.;
Vol. 39 , No. 1 , pp. 35-43
392 views Abstract
2000
The uncertainty and ambiguity of leadership in the 21st century
April, Kurt A.;Hill, Susan;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 45-52
378 views Abstract
2018
Employee perceptions of organisational democracy and its influence on organisational citizenship behaviour
Tokay, Özhan;Eyupoglu, Serife Z.;
Vol. 49 , No. 1
365 views DOI
2014
The impact of infrastructural change and regulation on entrepreneurial competitiveness in the South African telecommunications sector
Oberholzer, S. M.;Cullen, M.;Adendorff, C.;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 97-110
349 views Abstract
2006
A generic instrument to measure customer satisfaction with the controllable elements of the in-store shopping experience
Terblanche, N. S.;Boshoff, C.;
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 1-15
349 views Abstract
2015
The perceived influence of the elements of internal marketing on the brand image of a staffing agency group
Burin, C.;Roberts-Lombard, M.;Klopper, H. B.;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 71-81
348 views Abstract
2014
Choosing celebrity endorsers for advertising campaigns in cosmopolitan China: Does their ethnicity matter?
Apaolaza, A.;Hartmann, P.;He, J.;Barrutia, J. M.;Echebarria, C.;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 45-55
327 views Abstract
1997
New product strategy: Key characteristics that distinguish leading innovators in selected large South African manufacturing industries
Davies, Theresa-Anne;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 129-137
296 views Abstract
2024
A coherent Corporate Social Responsibility reporting framework for companies listed on the JSE Top 40 Index
Debeila, N.
Vol. 55 , pp. 0-0
71 views DOI
2019
Factors influencing dividend payout decisions: Evidence from South Africa
Nyere, L.
Vol. 50 , pp. 0-0
110 views DOI
2018
Employee perceptions of organisational democracy and its influence on organisational citizenship behaviour
Tokay, Özhan;Eyupoglu, Serife Z.;
Vol. 49 , No. 1
365 views DOI
2017
Strengthening graduate employee commitment through internal marketing in the South African retail banking industry
Roberts-Lombard, M.;Bruin, L. Reynolds-de;
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 91-105
193 views Abstract
2015
The perceived influence of the elements of internal marketing on the brand image of a staffing agency group
Burin, C.;Roberts-Lombard, M.;Klopper, H. B.;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 71-81
348 views Abstract
2014
The impact of infrastructural change and regulation on entrepreneurial competitiveness in the South African telecommunications sector
Oberholzer, S. M.;Cullen, M.;Adendorff, C.;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 97-110
349 views Abstract
2014
Choosing celebrity endorsers for advertising campaigns in cosmopolitan China: Does their ethnicity matter?
Apaolaza, A.;Hartmann, P.;He, J.;Barrutia, J. M.;Echebarria, C.;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 45-55
327 views Abstract
2013
International tourists’ perceptions of crime-risk and their future travel intentions during the 2010 FIFA World Cup™ in South Africa
George, R,;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 47-60
407 views Abstract
2008
The drivers influencing the relationship between sales representatives and customers and the impact this relationship has on sales volume within Coca-Cola’s Western Cape region
Herbst, F. J.;Forrest, C. L.;
Vol. 39 , No. 1 , pp. 35-43
392 views Abstract
2006
A generic instrument to measure customer satisfaction with the controllable elements of the in-store shopping experience
Terblanche, N. S.;Boshoff, C.;
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 1-15
349 views Abstract
Journament Score
26.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,228 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

26.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

13.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.