Indexed in Journament

asian-australasian journal of animal sciences

ISSN 1011-2367· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,402 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 67.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name asian-australas j anim sci
Abbreviated Name asian-australas j anim sci
ISSN 1011-2367

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 44.4
Innovation 54.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 75.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.2
Accessibility — 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 44.4 28.2
Innovation 54.0 30.1
Community Impact 8.6 11.5
Content Distribution 75.4 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2020
Quality comparison of retorted Samgyetang made from white semi-broilers, commercial broilers, Korean native chickens, and old laying hens
Jeong, H.
Vol. 33 , pp. 139-147
478 views DOI
2016
Relationship between Molecular Structure Characteristics of Feed Proteins and Protein Digestibility and Solubility
Bai, Mingmei;Qin, Guixin;Sun, Zewei;Long, Guohui;
Vol. 29 , No. 8 , pp. 1159-1165
452 views Abstract
2016
Is Hiding Foot and Mouth Disease Sensitive Behavior for Farmers? A Survey Study in Sri Lanka.
Gunarathne, Anoma;Kubota, Satoko;Kumarawadu, Pradeep;Karunagoda, Kamal;Kon, Hiroichi;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 280-7
435 views DOI Abstract
2018
Genome-wide association study of carcass weight in commercial Hanwoo cattle.
Edea, Zewdu;Jeoung, Yeong Ho;Shin, Sung-Sub;Ku, Jaeul;Seo, Sungbo;Kim, Il-Hoi;Kim, Sang-Wook;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 327-334
433 views DOI Abstract
2014
Effect of packaging method and storage time on physicochemical characteristics of dry-cured pork neck products at 10°c.
Kim, Il-Suk;Jin, Sang-Keun;Yang, Mi-Ra;Ahn, Dong Uk;Park, Jae-Hong;Kang, Suk-Nam;
Vol. 27 , No. 11 , pp. 1623-9
415 views DOI Abstract
2018
The use of data mining methods for dystocia detection in Polish Holstein-Friesian Black-and-White cattle.
Zaborski, Daniel;Proskura, Witold S;Grzesiak, Wilhelm;
Vol. 31 , No. 11 , pp. 1700-1713
394 views DOI Abstract
2014
Genetic Structure of and Evidence for Admixture between Western and Korean Native Pig Breeds Revealed by Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Edea, Zewdu;Kim, Sang-Wook;Lee, Kyung-Tai;Kim, Tae Hun;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 1263-1269
381 views Abstract
2019
Potential of four corn varieties at different harvest stages for silage production in Malaysia
Nazli, Muhamad Hazim;Halim, Ridzwan Abdul;Abdullah, Amin Mahir;Hussin, Ghazali;Samsudin, Anjas Asmara;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 224-232
368 views Abstract
2008
Tethering meat goats grazing forage of high nutritive value and low to moderate mass
Patra, A.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1252-1261
362 views DOI
2014
Genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analyses Reveal Genetic Diversity and Structure of Wild and Domestic Cattle in Bangladesh
Uzzaman, Md. Rasel;Edea, Zewdu;Bhuiyan, Md. Shamsul Alam;Walker, Jeremy;Bhuiyan, A. K. F. H.;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 27 , No. 10 , pp. 1381-1386
360 views Abstract
2020
Quality comparison of retorted Samgyetang made from white semi-broilers, commercial broilers, Korean native chickens, and old laying hens
Jeong, H.
Vol. 33 , pp. 139-147
478 views DOI
2019
Potential of four corn varieties at different harvest stages for silage production in Malaysia
Nazli, Muhamad Hazim;Halim, Ridzwan Abdul;Abdullah, Amin Mahir;Hussin, Ghazali;Samsudin, Anjas Asmara;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 224-232
368 views Abstract
2019
Analysis of excreta bacterial community after forced-molting in aged laying hens.
Han, Gi Ppeum;Lee, Kyu-Chan;Kang, Hwan Ku;Oh, Han Na;Sul, Woo Jun;Kil, Dong Yong;
231 views DOI Abstract
2018
Genome-wide association study of carcass weight in commercial Hanwoo cattle.
Edea, Zewdu;Jeoung, Yeong Ho;Shin, Sung-Sub;Ku, Jaeul;Seo, Sungbo;Kim, Il-Hoi;Kim, Sang-Wook;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 327-334
433 views DOI Abstract
2018
The use of data mining methods for dystocia detection in Polish Holstein-Friesian Black-and-White cattle.
Zaborski, Daniel;Proskura, Witold S;Grzesiak, Wilhelm;
Vol. 31 , No. 11 , pp. 1700-1713
394 views DOI Abstract
2017
Analysis of low-marbled Hanwoo cow meat aged with different dry-aging methods
Lee, Hyun Jung;Choe, Juhui;Kim, Kwan Tae;Oh, Jungmin;Lee, Da Gyeom;Kwon, Ki Moon;Choi, Yang Il;Jo, Cheorun;
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 1733-1738
191 views Abstract
2016
Relationship between Molecular Structure Characteristics of Feed Proteins and Protein Digestibility and Solubility
Bai, Mingmei;Qin, Guixin;Sun, Zewei;Long, Guohui;
Vol. 29 , No. 8 , pp. 1159-1165
452 views Abstract
2016
Is Hiding Foot and Mouth Disease Sensitive Behavior for Farmers? A Survey Study in Sri Lanka.
Gunarathne, Anoma;Kubota, Satoko;Kumarawadu, Pradeep;Karunagoda, Kamal;Kon, Hiroichi;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 280-7
435 views DOI Abstract
2014
Genetic Structure of and Evidence for Admixture between Western and Korean Native Pig Breeds Revealed by Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Edea, Zewdu;Kim, Sang-Wook;Lee, Kyung-Tai;Kim, Tae Hun;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 1263-1269
381 views Abstract
2014
Genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analyses Reveal Genetic Diversity and Structure of Wild and Domestic Cattle in Bangladesh
Uzzaman, Md. Rasel;Edea, Zewdu;Bhuiyan, Md. Shamsul Alam;Walker, Jeremy;Bhuiyan, A. K. F. H.;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 27 , No. 10 , pp. 1381-1386
360 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,402 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

44.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.