Indexed in Journament

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE

ISSN 1940-087X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.2 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #60 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
62 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Vis Exp
Abbreviated Name j vis exp
ISSN 1940-087X
URL http://www.jove.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 70.0 3.0
Diversity 66.7 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 13.6 4.2
Content Distribution 75.2 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (62)

2016
simultaneous loading of 5-florouracil and spions in hsa nanoparticles: optimization of preparation, characterization and in vitro drug release study
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 35-42
733 views DOI Abstract
2017
2019
Application of 3D Printing in the Construction of Burr Hole Ring for Deep Brain Stimulation Implants.
Vol. 39 , No. 151 , pp. 65-70
514 views DOI Abstract
2019
Processing Embryo, Eggshell, and Fungal Culture for Scanning Electron Microscopy.
, No. 150
502 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disclosing Hemolymph Collection and Inoculation of Metarhizium Blastospores into Rhipicephalus Microplus Ticks Towards Invertebrate Pathology Studies.
, No. 148
486 views DOI Abstract
2018
a comparative study of antibacterial effects of mouthwashes containing ag/zno or zno nanoparticles with chlorhexidine and investigation of their cytotoxicity
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 102-110
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
An All-in-one Sample Holder for Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography with Minimal Background Scattering.
, No. 149
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Labor-saving and Repeatable Touch-force Signaling Mutant Screen Protocol for the Study of Thigmomorphogenesis of a Model Plant Arabidopsis thaliana.
Vol. 115 , No. 150 , pp. 0-0
449 views DOI Abstract
2018
Quasi-metagenomic Analysis of Salmonella from Food and Environmental Samples.
, No. 140
448 views DOI Abstract
2021
Recombinant Production of Bifidobacterial Endoglycosidases for N-glycan Release.
, No. 173
244 views DOI Abstract
2021
A Permanent Window for Investigating Cancer Metastasis to the Lung.
, No. 173
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reconstruction of Single-Cell Innate Fluorescence Signatures by Confocal Microscopy.
, No. 159
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens.
, No. 156
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
IR-TEx: An Open Source Data Integration Tool for Big Data Transcriptomics Designed for the Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae.
, No. 155
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Immunoglobulin G N-Glycan Analysis by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography.
, No. 155
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits.
, No. 151
315 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.2/100 · Average
Ranked #60 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.2/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.