neonatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2838 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

neonatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name neonatology
Abbreviated Name neonatology
ISSN 1661-7819
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.karger.com/Journal/Home/224215
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2020
Effect of Phenobarbitone on Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography in Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy during Hypothermia
Poorva Deshpande;Amish Jain;Patrick J. McNamara;
Vol. 117 , No. 6 , pp. 721-728
377 views Abstract
2019
Cardiorespiratory Physiology following Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants.
Sehgal, Arvind;Bhatia, Risha;Roberts, Calum T;
, pp. 1-8
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Association of Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Acute Kidney Injury in Premature Infants from the Assessment of the Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates (AWAKEN) Study.
Stoops, Christine;Boohaker, Louis;Sims, Brian;Griffin, Russell;Selewski, David T;Askenazi, David;, ;
, pp. 1-10
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reply to the Letter to the Editor "Delayed Cord Clamping in Twin Pregnancies: to Do or Not to Do?"
Ruangkit, Chayatat;Nuntnarumit, Pracha;
Vol. 116 , No. 1 , pp. 8-9
309 views DOI
2020
Epidural-Related Fever and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jansen, Sophie;Lopriore, Enrico;Naaktgeboren, Christiana;Sueters, Marieke;Limpens, Jacqueline;van Leeuwen, Elisabeth;Bekker, Vincent;
, pp. 1-12
285 views DOI Abstract
1972
Relationship between Extracellular and Intracellular Hydrogen Ion Concentrations and Hemoglobin Oxygen Affinity in the Blood of Premature Infants with RDS
H. Manzke;H. Manzke;
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 321-333
273 views DOI
1975
Estimation of Red Blood Cell Volume in Premature Infants With and Without Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Robert H. Usher,Saroj Saigal,Allison O’Neill,Yeldandi Surainder,Le-Beng Chua;Robert H. Usher;Saroj Saigal;Allison O’Neill;Yeldandi Surainder;Le-Beng Chua;
Vol. 26 , No. 3-4 , pp. 241-248
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pharmacoepidemiology of Furosemide in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Elizabeth J. Thompson;Daniel K. Benjamin;Rachel G. Greenberg;Karan R. Kumar;Kanecia O. Zimmerman;Matthew Laughon;Reese H. Clark;P. Brian Smith;Christoph P. Hornik;
Vol. 117 , No. 6 , pp. 780-784
238 views Abstract
2020
Electrostatic Filters to Reduce COVID-19 Spread in Bubble CPAP: An in vitro Study of Safety and Efficacy
Jonathan W. Davis;J. Jane Pillow;Matthew N. Cooper;Mar Janna Dahl;
Vol. 117 , No. 6 , pp. 736-741
236 views Abstract
2020
Hypothyroidism after Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Device Closure in an Extremely Preterm Infant: Possible Role of Iodinated IV Contrast
Monika Piatek;Douglas J. Schneider;W. Jackson Smith;Mina Hanna;Elie G. Abu Jawdeh;
Vol. 117 , No. 6 , pp. 776-779
228 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.