Epidural-Related Fever and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clicks: 311
ID: 87241
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
311 views
57 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #5 of 28 articles by views in neonatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
While epidural analgesia (EA) is associated with maternal fever during labor, the impact on the risk for maternal and/or neonatal sepsis is unknown.The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of epidural-related intrapartum fever on maternal and neonatal outcomes.OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies from inception to November 2018. A total of 761 studies were identified with 100 eligible for full-text review. Only articles investigating the relationship between EA and maternal fever during labor were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool and National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Two meta-analyses - one each for the RCT and observational cohort groups - were performed using the random-effects model of Mantel-Haenszel to produce summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI.Twelve RCTs and 16 observational cohort studies involving 579,157 parturients were included. RRs for maternal fever for the RCT and cohort analyses were 3.54 (95% CI 2.61-4.81) and 5.60 (95% CI 4.50-6.97), respectively. Meta-analyses of RR for maternal infection in both groups were infeasible given few occurrences. Meta-analysis of data from observational studies showed an increased risk for maternal antibiotic treatment in the epidural group (RR 2.60; 95% CI 1.31-5.17). For both analyses, neonates born to women with an epidural were not evaluated more often for suspected sepsis. Neither analysis reported an increased rate of neonatal bacteremia or neonatal antibiotic treatment after EA, although data precluded conclusiveness.EA increases the risk of intrapartum fever and maternal antibiotic treatment. However, a definite conclusion on whether EA increases the risk for a proven maternal and/or neonatal bacteremia cannot be drawn due to the low quality of data. Further research on whether epidural-related intrapartum fever is of infectious origin or not is therefore needed.
| Reference Key |
jansen2020epiduralrelatedneonatology
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jansen, Sophie;Lopriore, Enrico;Naaktgeboren, Christiana;Sueters, Marieke;Limpens, Jacqueline;van Leeuwen, Elisabeth;Bekker, Vincent; |
| Journal | neonatology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1159/000504805
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.