educational management administration and leadership | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8596 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

educational management administration and leadership

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name educational management administration and leadership
Abbreviated Name educational management administration and leadership
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ job performance: Evidence from Edo State, Nigeria
Imhangbe, O.
Vol. 47 , pp. 909-924
342 views DOI
2018
management of posttraumatic long bone defects in the national orthopedic practice (literature review)
;Alexander L. Shastov;Natalia A. Kononovich;Elena N. Gorbach
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 252-257
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Collaborative school leadership: Can it co-exist with solo leadership in high accountability settings?
Bush, T.
Vol. 47 , pp. 661-662
271 views DOI
2019
Leadership ambidexterity: Key to stimulating team learning through team-oriented HRM? An explorative study among teacher teams in VET colleges
Bouwmans, M.
Vol. 47 , pp. 694-711
264 views DOI
2019
The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility
Connolly, M.
Vol. 47 , pp. 504-519
255 views DOI
2018
Perceptions of secondary school principals on management of cultural diversity in Spain. The challenge of educational leadership
Gómez-Hurtado, I.
Vol. 46 , pp. 441-456
250 views DOI
2019
Corrigendum: Goals aligned: Predictors of common goal identification in educational cross-sectoral collaboration initiatives, (Educational Management Administration & Leadership, (2019), 10.1177/1741143219846906)
not, found
, pp. 0-0
247 views DOI
2019
Between Venus and Mars: Sources of gender differences in instructional leadership
Shaked, H.
Vol. 47 , pp. 291-309
234 views DOI
2019
Distinguishing between educational leadership and management: Compatible or incompatible constructs?
Bush, T.
Vol. 47 , pp. 501-503
224 views DOI
2019
Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018
Hallinger, P.
, pp. 0-0
206 views DOI
View All 16 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.