Indexed in Journament

british journal of nursing (mark allen publishing)

ISSN 0966-0461· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #7,964 of 33,995 indexed journals
17 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name br j nurs
Abbreviated Name br j nurs
ISSN 0966-0461

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2019
The impact of brief lifestyle self-management education for the control of seizures.
Edward, Karen-Leigh;Cook, Mark;Stephenson, John;Giandinoto, Jo-Ann;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 348-354
507 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health professionals' lack of knowledge of central venous access devices: the impact on patients.
Kelly, Linda J;Snowden, Austyn;Paterson, Ruth;Campbell, Karen;
Vol. 28 , No. 14 , pp. S4-S14
431 views DOI Abstract
2018
Black, Asian and minority ethnic female nurses: colonialism, power and racism.
Brathwaite, Beverley;
Vol. 27 , No. 5 , pp. 254-258
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating the impact of a coaching pilot on students and staff.
Underwood, Stella;Green, Julie;Walton, Rachel;Hackett, Kate;Cooke, Janet;Pegg, Marie;Armstrong, Christine;
Vol. 28 , No. 21 , pp. 1394-1398
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
A global problem of epic proportions.
Tingle, John;
Vol. 28 , No. 18 , pp. 1218-1219
390 views DOI Abstract
2017
A blended learning approach to teaching CVAD care and maintenance.
Hainey, Karen;Kelly, Linda J;Green, Audrey;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. S4-S12
375 views DOI Abstract
'Not a job for a man': factors in the use of touch by male nursing staff.
Whiteside, James;Butcher, Dan;
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 335-41
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reusable learning objects for nurse education: development, evaluation, challenges and recommendations.
Khan, Ehsan;Tarling, Maggie;Calder, Ian;
Vol. 28 , No. 17 , pp. 1136-1143
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Investigating intercultural effectiveness of paediatric nurses in a Turkish hospital.
Yılmaz, Medine;Sarı, Hatice Yıldırım;Ünlü, Meltem;Yetim, Perihan;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 152-158
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiences of nurses and other health workers participating in a reflective course on compassion-based care.
Donald, Graeme;Wilson, Ian;McCarthy, Jodie;Hall, Ian;Crossley, Brenda;Adshead, Paula;Shaw, Vanessa;Dunne, Ross;Dwyer, Trish;
Vol. 28 , No. 15 , pp. 1020-1025
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
Investigating intercultural effectiveness of paediatric nurses in a Turkish hospital.
Yılmaz, Medine;Sarı, Hatice Yıldırım;Ünlü, Meltem;Yetim, Perihan;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 152-158
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Parallels between seminars and problem-based learning.
Ahmed, Abiya Amna;Kooner, Amrit Kaur;Mitra, Roshni;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 165
146 views DOI
2020
Patients' experiences of living with multiple myeloma.
Cuffe, Clare Horgan;Quirke, Mary B;McCabe, Catherine;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 103-110
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of brief lifestyle self-management education for the control of seizures.
Edward, Karen-Leigh;Cook, Mark;Stephenson, John;Giandinoto, Jo-Ann;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 348-354
507 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health professionals' lack of knowledge of central venous access devices: the impact on patients.
Kelly, Linda J;Snowden, Austyn;Paterson, Ruth;Campbell, Karen;
Vol. 28 , No. 14 , pp. S4-S14
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reflection on creating a coaching approach to student nurse clinical leadership development.
Leigh, Jacqueline;Littlewood, Lisa;Lyons, Gareth;
Vol. 28 , No. 17 , pp. 1124-1128
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating the impact of a coaching pilot on students and staff.
Underwood, Stella;Green, Julie;Walton, Rachel;Hackett, Kate;Cooke, Janet;Pegg, Marie;Armstrong, Christine;
Vol. 28 , No. 21 , pp. 1394-1398
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association between ethnic background and prostate cancer.
McAllister, Bría J;
Vol. 28 , No. 18 , pp. S4-S10
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
A global problem of epic proportions.
Tingle, John;
Vol. 28 , No. 18 , pp. 1218-1219
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reusable learning objects for nurse education: development, evaluation, challenges and recommendations.
Khan, Ehsan;Tarling, Maggie;Calder, Ian;
Vol. 28 , No. 17 , pp. 1136-1143
362 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #7,964 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

42.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.