Indexed in Journament

phytochemistry letters

ISSN 18743900· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
55.4 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #11 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
805 Articles
Scores higher than 99.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

简称 phytochemistry letters
缩写名称 phytochemistry letters
ISSN 18743900
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/phytochemistry-letters

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for phytochemistry letters
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 75.7 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 17.9 4.2
Content Distribution 69.1 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (805)

2016
the infection of cucumber (cucumis sativus l.) roots by meloidogyne incognita alters the expression of actin-depolymerizing factor (adf) genes, particularly in association with giant cell formation
Vol. 7 , pp. -
528 views DOI Abstract
2016
contrasting proteomic and metabolomic responses of bermudagrass to drought and salt stresses
Vol. 7 , pp. -
512 views DOI Abstract
2014
recent advances in understanding of meiosis initiation and the apomictic pathway in plants
Vol. 5 , pp. -
469 views DOI Abstract
2018
corrigendum: reference genes for qpcr analysis in resin-tapped adult slash pine as a tool to address the molecular basis of commercial resinosis
Vol. 9 , pp. -
466 views DOI
2018
modify the histone to win the battle: chromatin dynamics in plant–pathogen interactions
Vol. 9 , pp. -
464 views DOI Abstract
2016
the root hair specific syp123 regulates the localization of cell wall components and contributes to rizhobacterial priming of induced systemic resistance
Vol. 7 , pp. -
453 views DOI Abstract
2018
genetic diversity and domestication footprints of chinese cherry [cerasus pseudocerasus (lindl.) g.don] as revealed by nuclear microsatellites
Vol. 9 , pp. -
434 views DOI Abstract
2026
Decarboxylative Borylation of Redox-Active Esters by Au/Amine Catalysis
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
A Porphyrin Cage Formed via Imine Bonds that Encapsulates Fullerenes
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction using polymeric organic acid
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Enhanced and Swift Adsorptive Removal of Basic Violet 3 Dye Utilizing MWCNT-MXene Composite
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Scanning tunneling microscopy study of acrolein adsorbed on Cu(111)
12 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
55.4/100 · Average
Ranked #11 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

55.4/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

75.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

17.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.