anales de pediatria (barcelona, spain : 2003) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3554 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

anales de pediatria (barcelona, spain : 2003)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name an pediatr (barc)
Abbreviated Name an pediatr (barc)
ISSN 1695-9531
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/anales-de-pediatria
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2019
[Outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal intensive care unit: Risk factors and key preventive measures for eradication in record time].
Fernández-Prada, María;Martínez-Ortega, Carmen;Santos-Simarro, Guillermo;Morán-Álvarez, Patricia;Fernández-Verdugo, Ana;Costa-Romero, Marta;
Vol. 91 , No. 1 , pp. 13-20
381 views DOI Abstract
2012
[Evaluation of anthropometric development in patients with enuresis]
Espino R; ;;
Vol. 77 , No. 3 , pp. -
359 views Abstract
2019
[Psychosocial aspects associated with excessive attendance in primary care paediatric clinics].
Martín Martín, Raquel;Sánchez Bayle, Marciano;Teruel de Francisco, Carmen;
Vol. 90 , No. 1 , pp. 26-31
301 views DOI Abstract
2018
[The epidemiology of pharmacologically treated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the Region of Murcia, Spain: Differences by gender, age and location of residence].
Sánchez Martínez, Diego Pablo;Guillén Pérez, José Jesús;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 183-190
295 views DOI Abstract
2013
historia de las antiguas investigaciones realizadas en el yacimiento de la cueva de ambrosio (vÉlez-blanco, almerÍa, espaÑa)
;Sergio Ripoll López;Francisco J. Muñoz Ibañez;Jesús F. Jordá Pardo
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. -
291 views DOI Abstract
2009
las primicias de caín : ofrendas de cereales en el neolítico meridional ibérico
;Beatriz Gavilán Ceballos;José Luis Escacena Carrasco
, No. 2 , pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2013
pinares y enebrales. el paisaje solutrense en iberia
;Ernestina Badal García;Yolanda Carrión;Isabel Figueiral;María Oliva Rodríguez-Ariza
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. -
269 views DOI Abstract
2013
las cuevas de la lluera (san juan de priorio, oviedo, asturias, espaÑa): elaboraciÓn mediante un sig de una estratigrafÍa solutrense
;José Adolfo Rodríguez Asensio;José Manuel Barrera Logares;Eugenio Aguilar Huergo
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. -
255 views DOI Abstract
2013
el registro micropaleontolÓgico del solutrense en la regiÓn cantÁbrica (espaÑa): estado de la cuestiÓn
;Naroa García Ibaibarriaga;María José Iriarte-Chiapusso;Xabier Murelaga
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. -
232 views DOI Abstract
2015
reseÑa de : flors ureña, enric. los vasos del palacio de geldo. forma, decoración y simbolismo en la “obra aspra” del siglo xv. castellón: editarx, 2013.
;Antonio Malalana Ureña
, No. 6 , pp. 495-497
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 46 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.