JMIR formative research | Journament
This journal has not been published yet.

Journal Ranking

#1262 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 21 hours ago

JMIR formative research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name JMIR Form Res
Abbreviated Name jmir form res
ISSN 2561-326X
Aim and Scope
URL https://formative.jmir.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2019
Using Computer Tablets to Improve Moods for Older Adults With Dementia and Interactions With Their Caregivers: Pilot Intervention Study.
Gilson, Aaron;Dodds, Debby;Kaur, Arveen;Potteiger, Michael;Ford Ii, James H;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14530
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychiatry Outpatients' Willingness to Share Social Media Posts and Smartphone Data for Research and Clinical Purposes: Survey Study.
Rieger, Agnes;Gaines, Averi;Barnett, Ian;Baldassano, Claudia Frances;Connolly Gibbons, Mary Beth;Crits-Christoph, Paul;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14329
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing a Digital Solution for Dengue Through Epihack: Qualitative Evaluation Study of a Five-Day Health Hackathon in Sri Lanka.
Panchapakesan, Chitra;Sheldenkar, Anita;Wimalaratne, Prasad;Wijayamuni, Ruwan;Lwin, May Oo;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e11555
411 views DOI Abstract
2018
Game Plan: Development of a Web App Designed to Help Men Who Have Sex With Men Reduce Their HIV Risk and Alcohol Use.
Wray, Tyler;Kahler, Christopher W;Simpanen, Erik M;Operario, Don;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. e10125
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Mental Well-Being Intervention for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Pilot Mixed Methods Study.
Vereenooghe, Leen;Westermann, Kristian;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. e15190
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
Natural Language Processing Tools for Assessing Progress and Outcome of Two Veteran Populations: Insights from a Novel Online Intervention for Post Traumatic Growth.
Norman, Kim P;Govindjee, Anita;Norman, Seth R;Godoy, Michael;Cerrone, Kimberlie L;Kieschnick, Dustin W;Kassler, William;
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Electronic Health HIV Prevention Toolkit Intervention With Concordant HIV-Negative, Same-Sex Male Couples on Sexual Agreement Outcomes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mitchell, Jason William;Lee, Ji-Young;Wu, Yanyan;Sullivan, Patrick S;Stephenson, Rob;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. e16807
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Smoking Cessation for Heavy Drinkers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kahler, Christopher William;Cohn, Amy M;Costantino, Catherine;Toll, Benjamin A;Spillane, Nichea S;Graham, Amanda L;
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumption of Health-Related Content on Social Media Among Adolescent Girls: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
Leary, Miriam P;Clegg, Emily N;Santella, Madison E;Murray, Pamela J;Downs, Julie S;Olfert, Melissa D;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e11404
332 views DOI Abstract
2021
Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers
David Vlahov;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e25687-
319 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.