Indexed in Journament

JMIR formative research

ISSN 2561-326X· EN

Journal Website
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0/100
Journament Score
#3,235
Journament Rank
24
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name JMIR Form Res
Abbreviated Name jmir form res
ISSN 2561-326X
URL https://formative.jmir.org

Indexings

ncbi doaj

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2019
Using Computer Tablets to Improve Moods for Older Adults With Dementia and Interactions With Their Caregivers: Pilot Intervention Study.
Gilson, Aaron;Dodds, Debby;Kaur, Arveen;Potteiger, Michael;Ford Ii, James H;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14530
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychiatry Outpatients' Willingness to Share Social Media Posts and Smartphone Data for Research and Clinical Purposes: Survey Study.
Rieger, Agnes;Gaines, Averi;Barnett, Ian;Baldassano, Claudia Frances;Connolly Gibbons, Mary Beth;Crits-Christoph, Paul;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14329
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing a Digital Solution for Dengue Through Epihack: Qualitative Evaluation Study of a Five-Day Health Hackathon in Sri Lanka.
Panchapakesan, Chitra;Sheldenkar, Anita;Wimalaratne, Prasad;Wijayamuni, Ruwan;Lwin, May Oo;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e11555
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Mental Well-Being Intervention for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Pilot Mixed Methods Study.
Vereenooghe, Leen;Westermann, Kristian;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. e15190
415 views DOI Abstract
2018
Game Plan: Development of a Web App Designed to Help Men Who Have Sex With Men Reduce Their HIV Risk and Alcohol Use.
Wray, Tyler;Kahler, Christopher W;Simpanen, Erik M;Operario, Don;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. e10125
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Natural Language Processing Tools for Assessing Progress and Outcome of Two Veteran Populations: Insights from a Novel Online Intervention for Post Traumatic Growth.
Norman, Kim P;Govindjee, Anita;Norman, Seth R;Godoy, Michael;Cerrone, Kimberlie L;Kieschnick, Dustin W;Kassler, William;
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Electronic Health HIV Prevention Toolkit Intervention With Concordant HIV-Negative, Same-Sex Male Couples on Sexual Agreement Outcomes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mitchell, Jason William;Lee, Ji-Young;Wu, Yanyan;Sullivan, Patrick S;Stephenson, Rob;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. e16807
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Smoking Cessation for Heavy Drinkers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kahler, Christopher William;Cohn, Amy M;Costantino, Catherine;Toll, Benjamin A;Spillane, Nichea S;Graham, Amanda L;
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumption of Health-Related Content on Social Media Among Adolescent Girls: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
Leary, Miriam P;Clegg, Emily N;Santella, Madison E;Murray, Pamela J;Downs, Julie S;Olfert, Melissa D;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e11404
342 views DOI Abstract
2021
Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers
David Vlahov;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e25687-
329 views DOI Abstract
2024
Evaluating ChatGPT-4's Accuracy in Identifying Final Diagnoses Within Differential Diagnoses Compared With Those of Physicians: Experimental Study for Diagnostic Cases.
Hirosawa, Takanobu;Harada, Yukinori;Mizuta, Kazuya;Sakamoto, Tetsu;Tokumasu, Kazuki;Shimizu, Taro;
Vol. 8 , pp. e59267
115 views DOI Abstract
2023
Interdisciplinary Approach to Identify and Characterize COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Mixed Methods Study.
Isip Tan, Iris Thiele;Cleofas, Jerome;Solano, Geoffrey;Pillejera, Jeanne Genevive;Catapang, Jasper Kyle;
Vol. 7 , pp. e41134
105 views DOI Abstract
2023
Interdisciplinary Approach to Identify and Characterize COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Mixed Methods Study
Tan, Iris Thiele Isip;Cleofas, Jerome;Solano, Geoffrey;Pillejera, Jeanne Genevive;Catapang, Jasper Kyle;
Vol. 7 , pp. e41134-
52 views Abstract
2022
Improving Well-being With a Mobile Artificial Intelligence-Powered Acceptance Commitment Therapy Tool: Pragmatic Retrospective Study.
Naor, Navot;Frenkel, Alex;Winsberg, Mirène;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. e36018
141 views DOI Abstract
2021
Using a Mobile App–Based Video Recommender System of Patient Narratives to Prepare Women for Breast Cancer Surgery: Development and Usability Study Informed by Qualitative Data
Susan Law;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e22970-
126 views DOI Abstract
2021
Acceptability of Research and Health Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
Michelle I Cardel;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e27185-
131 views DOI Abstract
2021
Expanding the Reach of Research: Quantitative Evaluation of a Web-Based Approach for Remote Recruitment of People Who Hear Voices
Dror Ben-Zeev;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e23118-
149 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development of the 12-Item Social Media Disinformation Scale and its Association With Social Media Addiction and Mental Health Related to COVID-19 in Tunisia: Survey-Based Pilot Case Study
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e27280-
228 views DOI Abstract
2021
Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers
David Vlahov;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e25687-
329 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and Feasibility of an App to Decrease Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes in Hispanic Women With Recent Gestational Diabetes (Hola Bebé, Adiós Diabetes): Pilot Pre-Post Study
Sue E Levkoff;
Vol. 4 , No. 12 , pp. e19677-
76 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.