Indexed in Journament

JMIR formative research

ISSN 2561-326X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #978 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 96.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name JMIR Form Res
Abbreviated Name jmir form res
ISSN 2561-326X
URL https://formative.jmir.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.3
Accessibility 35.0 18.3
Timeliness 20.0 12.6
Diversity 57.4 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 13.6 9.7
Content Distribution 66.1 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2019
Using Computer Tablets to Improve Moods for Older Adults With Dementia and Interactions With Their Caregivers: Pilot Intervention Study.
Gilson, Aaron;Dodds, Debby;Kaur, Arveen;Potteiger, Michael;Ford Ii, James H;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14530
494 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychiatry Outpatients' Willingness to Share Social Media Posts and Smartphone Data for Research and Clinical Purposes: Survey Study.
Rieger, Agnes;Gaines, Averi;Barnett, Ian;Baldassano, Claudia Frances;Connolly Gibbons, Mary Beth;Crits-Christoph, Paul;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e14329
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing a Digital Solution for Dengue Through Epihack: Qualitative Evaluation Study of a Five-Day Health Hackathon in Sri Lanka.
Panchapakesan, Chitra;Sheldenkar, Anita;Wimalaratne, Prasad;Wijayamuni, Ruwan;Lwin, May Oo;
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e11555
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Mental Well-Being Intervention for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Pilot Mixed Methods Study.
Vereenooghe, Leen;Westermann, Kristian;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. e15190
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Natural Language Processing Tools for Assessing Progress and Outcome of Two Veteran Populations: Insights from a Novel Online Intervention for Post Traumatic Growth.
Norman, Kim P;Govindjee, Anita;Norman, Seth R;Godoy, Michael;Cerrone, Kimberlie L;Kieschnick, Dustin W;Kassler, William;
429 views DOI Abstract
2018
Game Plan: Development of a Web App Designed to Help Men Who Have Sex With Men Reduce Their HIV Risk and Alcohol Use.
Wray, Tyler;Kahler, Christopher W;Simpanen, Erik M;Operario, Don;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. e10125
424 views DOI Abstract
2020
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Electronic Health HIV Prevention Toolkit Intervention With Concordant HIV-Negative, Same-Sex Male Couples on Sexual Agreement Outcomes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mitchell, Jason William;Lee, Ji-Young;Wu, Yanyan;Sullivan, Patrick S;Stephenson, Rob;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. e16807
414 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Smoking Cessation for Heavy Drinkers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kahler, Christopher William;Cohn, Amy M;Costantino, Catherine;Toll, Benjamin A;Spillane, Nichea S;Graham, Amanda L;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumption of Health-Related Content on Social Media Among Adolescent Girls: Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
Leary, Miriam P;Clegg, Emily N;Santella, Madison E;Murray, Pamela J;Downs, Julie S;Olfert, Melissa D;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e11404
364 views DOI Abstract
2021
Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers
David Vlahov;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e25687-
343 views DOI Abstract
2024
Evaluating ChatGPT-4's Accuracy in Identifying Final Diagnoses Within Differential Diagnoses Compared With Those of Physicians: Experimental Study for Diagnostic Cases.
Hirosawa, Takanobu;Harada, Yukinori;Mizuta, Kazuya;Sakamoto, Tetsu;Tokumasu, Kazuki;Shimizu, Taro;
Vol. 8 , pp. e59267
166 views DOI Abstract
2023
Interdisciplinary Approach to Identify and Characterize COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Mixed Methods Study.
Isip Tan, Iris Thiele;Cleofas, Jerome;Solano, Geoffrey;Pillejera, Jeanne Genevive;Catapang, Jasper Kyle;
Vol. 7 , pp. e41134
132 views DOI Abstract
2023
Interdisciplinary Approach to Identify and Characterize COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Mixed Methods Study
Tan, Iris Thiele Isip;Cleofas, Jerome;Solano, Geoffrey;Pillejera, Jeanne Genevive;Catapang, Jasper Kyle;
Vol. 7 , pp. e41134-
74 views Abstract
2022
Improving Well-being With a Mobile Artificial Intelligence-Powered Acceptance Commitment Therapy Tool: Pragmatic Retrospective Study.
Naor, Navot;Frenkel, Alex;Winsberg, Mirène;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. e36018
167 views DOI Abstract
2021
Using a Mobile App–Based Video Recommender System of Patient Narratives to Prepare Women for Breast Cancer Surgery: Development and Usability Study Informed by Qualitative Data
Susan Law;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e22970-
143 views DOI Abstract
2021
Acceptability of Research and Health Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study
Michelle I Cardel;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e27185-
157 views DOI Abstract
2021
Expanding the Reach of Research: Quantitative Evaluation of a Web-Based Approach for Remote Recruitment of People Who Hear Voices
Dror Ben-Zeev;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e23118-
174 views DOI Abstract
2021
Development of the 12-Item Social Media Disinformation Scale and its Association With Social Media Addiction and Mental Health Related to COVID-19 in Tunisia: Survey-Based Pilot Case Study
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e27280-
248 views DOI Abstract
2021
Racial Discrimination, Sedentary Time, and Physical Activity in African Americans: Quantitative Study Combining Ecological Momentary Assessment and Accelerometers
David Vlahov;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e25687-
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and Feasibility of an App to Decrease Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes in Hispanic Women With Recent Gestational Diabetes (Hola Bebé, Adiós Diabetes): Pilot Pre-Post Study
Sue E Levkoff;
Vol. 4 , No. 12 , pp. e19677-
102 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #978 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.