Indexed in Journament

Journal of clinical microbiology

ISSN 1098-660X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,766 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
85 Articles
Scores higher than 46.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Clin Microbiol
Abbreviated Name j clin microbiol
ISSN 1098-660X
URL http://jcm.asm.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of clinical microbiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 20.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 12.1 9.7
Content Distribution 74.0 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (85)

2001
1995
Rapid bacterial antigen detection is not clinically useful
Vol. 33 , No. 6 , pp. -
597 views Abstract
2007
Changing antimicrobial susceptibility epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori strains in Japan between 2002 and 2005
Vol. 45 , No. 12 , pp. -
575 views Abstract
2004
Accuracy of phenotypic and genotypic testing for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and description of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae sp. nov
Vol. 42 , No. 10 , pp. -
516 views Abstract
2003
Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by psaA PCR analysis of lung aspirates from adult patients in Kenya
Vol. 41 , No. 6 , pp. -
516 views Abstract
1998
Epidemiological investigation of vaginal Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates by a genotypic method
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
1995
Prevalence of Cyclospora species and other enteric pathogens among children less than 5 years of age in Nepal
Vol. 33 , No. 11 , pp. -
477 views Abstract
2003
Evaluation of a PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in respiratory and nonrespiratory samples from adults with community-acquired pneumonia
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. -
463 views Abstract
2023
MGIT-seq for the Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and Drug Resistance: a Prospective Study.
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. e0162622
124 views DOI Abstract
2021
Performance Characteristics of the Vidas SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Serological Assays.
Vol. 59 , No. 4
70 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
Vol. 58 , No. 2
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Machine Learning Takes Laboratory Automation to the Next Level.
323 views DOI Abstract
2018
Total Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology: a Micro-Comic Strip.
Vol. 56 , No. 4
312 views DOI
2018
A Rapid Immunochromatography Test Based on Hcp1 Is a Potential Point-of-Care Test for Serological Diagnosis of Melioidosis.
Vol. 56 , No. 8
228 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,766 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.