journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#519 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j altern complement med
Abbreviated Name j altern complement med
ISSN 1557-7708
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.liebertpub.com/acm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2018
Comprehensive Lifestyle Modification Intervention to Improve Chronic Disease Risk Factors and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors.
Golubić, Mladen;Schneeberger, Dana;Kirkpatrick, Kristin;Bar, Judi;Bernstein, Adam;Weems, Fredina;Ehrman, Jane;Perko, Jim;Doyle, Jonathan;Roizen, Michael;
Vol. 24 , No. 11 , pp. 1085-1091
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chinese Herbal Medicine and Acupuncture Reduced the Risk of Stroke After Bell's Palsy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.
Ton, Gil;Liao, Hsien-Yin;Chiang, Jen-Huai;Chen, Yi-Hung;Lee, Yu-Chen;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 946-956
399 views DOI Abstract
2017
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Emotional Freedom Technique and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Adolescent Anxiety: A Pilot Study.
Gaesser, Amy H;Karan, Orv C;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 102-108
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Naturopathic Medicine for the Management of Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, and Menorrhagia: A Content Analysis.
Reid, Rebecca;Steel, Amie;Wardle, Jon;Adams, Jon;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 202-226
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Informing the Model of Care for an Academic Integrative Health Care Center: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Stakeholder Views.
Ee, Carolyn;Templeman, Kate;Grant, Suzanne;Avard, Nicole;de Manincor, Michael;Reath, Jennifer;Hunter, Jennifer;
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Group Medical Visits 2.0: The Open Source Wellness Behavioral Pharmacy Model.
Emmert-Aronson, Benjamin;Grill, Katherine B;Trivedi, Zalak;Markle, Elizabeth A;Chen, Steven;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Animal-Assisted Activity for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Parents' and Therapists' Perception.
Michelotto, Ana L L;Anater, Amanda;Guebert, Mirian C C;Borges, Tâmara D;Michelotto, Pedro V;Pimpão, Cláudia T;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 928-929
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does the Application of Tecar Therapy Affect Temperature and Perfusion of Skin and Muscle Microcirculation? A Pilot Feasibility Study on Healthy Subjects.
Clijsen, Ron;Leoni, Diego;Schneebeli, Alessandro;Cescon, Corrado;Soldini, Emiliano;Li, Lihui;Barbero, Marco;
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Introducing Hybrid Problem-Based Learning Modules in Ayurveda Education: Results of an Exploratory Study.
More, Varsha Raghunath;Singh, Girish;Patwardhan, Kishor;
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence and Characteristics of Chronic Spinal Pain Patients with Different Hopes (Treatment Goals) for Ongoing Chiropractic Care.
Herman, Patricia M;Edgington, Sarah E;Ryan, Gery W;Coulter, Ian D;
285 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.