Informing the Model of Care for an Academic Integrative Health Care Center: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Stakeholder Views.
Clicks: 409
ID: 97452
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
409 views
57 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #4 of 12 articles by views in journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To engage with local primary care stakeholders to inform the model of care for a proposed academic integrative health care center incorporating evidence-informed traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) in Sydney, Australia. In-depth semistructured interviews, informed by community-based participatory research principles, were conducted to explore primary care stakeholder preferences and service requirements regarding the proposed Western Sydney Integrative Health (WSIH) center in their local district. Telephone and face-to-face interviews at primary care clinics in Sydney. Thirteen participants took part in the study: eight general practitioners (GPs) and five primary care practice managers (PMs). GPs were recruited through local GP newsletters, closed GP Facebook groups, and snowballing. PMs were recruited through a national PM newsletter. The semistructured interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim before conducting a thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: (1) the rationale for "why" the WSIH center should be established, (2) "what" was most important to provide, and (3) "how" the center could achieve these goals. Participants were willing to refer to the service, acknowledging the demand for TCIM, current gaps in chronic disease care, and negligible Government funding for TCIM. They endorsed a model of care that minimizes out-of-pocket costs for the underserved, incorporates medical oversight, integrates evidence-informed TCIM with conventional health care, builds trust through interprofessional communication and education, and provides sound clinical governance with a strong focus on credentialing and risk management. It was proposed that safety and quality standards are best met by a GP-led approach and evidence-based practice. Our findings demonstrate that participants acknowledged the need for a model of care that fits into the local landscape through integrating conventional health care with TCIM in a team-based environment, with medical/GP oversight to ensure sound clinical governance. Findings will be used with input from other stakeholder groups to refine the WSIH model of care.
| Reference Key |
ee2020informingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ee, Carolyn;Templeman, Kate;Grant, Suzanne;Avard, Nicole;de Manincor, Michael;Reath, Jennifer;Hunter, Jennifer; |
| Journal | journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny) |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1089/acm.2019.0321
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.