Does the Application of Tecar Therapy Affect Temperature and Perfusion of Skin and Muscle Microcirculation? A Pilot Feasibility Study on Healthy Subjects.
Clicks: 386
ID: 59083
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
65.8
/100
386 views
240 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 12 articles by views in journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Tecar therapy (TT) is an endogenous thermotherapy used to generate warming up of superficial and deep tissues. TT capability to affect the blood flow is commonly considered to be the primary mechanism to promote tissue healing processes. Despite some preliminary evidence about its clinical efficacy, knowledge on the physiologic responses induced by TT is lacking. The aim of this quantitative randomized pilot study was to determinate if TT, delivered in two modes (resistive and capacitive), affects the perfusion of the skin microcirculation (PSMC) and intramuscular blood flow (IMBF). A randomized controlled pilot feasibility study. Ten healthy volunteers ( = 4 females, = 6 males; mean age 35.9 ± 10.7 years) from a university population were recruited and completed the study. All subjects received three different TT applications (resistive, capacitive, and placebo) for a period of 8 min. PSMC, IMBF, and the skin temperature (ST) were measured pre- and post-TT application using power Doppler sonography, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), and infrared thermography. Compared with placebo application, statistically significant differences in PSMC resulted after both the resistive ( = 0.0001) and the capacitive ( = 0.0001) TT applications, while only the resistive modality compared with the placebo was capable to induce a significant change of IMBF ( = 0.013) and ST ( = 0.0001). The use of power Doppler sonography and LSCI enabled us to evaluate differences in PSMC and IMBF induced by TT application.
| Reference Key |
clijsen2019doesjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Clijsen, Ron;Leoni, Diego;Schneebeli, Alessandro;Cescon, Corrado;Soldini, Emiliano;Li, Lihui;Barbero, Marco; |
| Journal | journal of alternative and complementary medicine (new york, ny) |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1089/acm.2019.0165
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.