Indexed in Journament

the turkish online journal of distance education

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,424 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 57.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name the turkish online journal of distance education
Abbreviated Name the turkish online journal of distance education

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 56.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the turkish online journal of distance education
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.9
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 56.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2015
THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 13-27
478 views Abstract
2009
THE HANDBOOK OF BLENDED LEARNING:Global Perspectives, Local Designs
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 222-225
439 views Abstract
2015
Potentiality of Disaster Management Education through Open and Distance Learning System in Bangladesh Open University
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 249-260
410 views Abstract
2012
THE STRATEGIC PLANNING (SWOT) ANALYSIS OUTCOMES AND SUGGESTIONS ACCORDING TO THE STUDENTS AND THE LECTURERS WITHIN THE DISTANCE EDUCATION SYSTEM
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 267-276
400 views Abstract
2018
Study Smart Not Hard
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 62-74
365 views Abstract
2009
From the Editor
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 5-8
361 views Abstract
2004
Considerations for The Instruction Of Research Methodologies In Graduate-Level Distance Education Degree Programs
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 40-48
355 views Abstract
2011
SOME STRUCTURAL CHANGES ON THE WAY TOWARDS EUNIVERSITY
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 126-137
344 views Abstract
2010
A BLENDED EDUCATION PROGRAM BASED ON CRITICAL THINKING AND ITS EFFECT ON PERSONALITY TYPE AND ATTRIBUTION STYLE OF THE STUDENTS
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 185-196
338 views Abstract
2009
E-LEARNING AS A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL UTILIZATION
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 159-170
332 views Abstract
2018
Study Smart Not Hard
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 62-74
365 views Abstract
2017
BOOK REVIEW STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 202-207
277 views Abstract
2015
The Usability Analysis of An E-Learning Environment
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 50-66
98 views Abstract
2015
THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 13-27
478 views Abstract
2015
Potentiality of Disaster Management Education through Open and Distance Learning System in Bangladesh Open University
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 249-260
410 views Abstract
2014
Evaluation Of Webquest In Biology:Teachers’ Perception
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 75-88
31 views Abstract
2014
From Editor
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 5-11
209 views Abstract
2013
From the Editor
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 5-11
256 views Abstract
2013
From Editor
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 4-11
128 views Abstract
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,424 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.