Indexed in Journament

journal of substance abuse treatment

ISSN 1873-6483· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,718 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 80.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j subst abuse treat
Abbreviated Name j subst abuse treat
ISSN 1873-6483
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-substance-abuse-treatment

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.9
Content Distribution 85.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of substance abuse treatment
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.9 7.8
Content Distribution 85.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Establishing the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a multi-component behavioral intervention to reduce pain and substance use and improve physical performance in older persons living with HIV.
Vol. 100 , pp. 29-38
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City.
Vol. 106 , pp. 79-88
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
U.S. alcohol treatment admissions after the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act: Do state parity laws and race/ethnicity make a difference?
413 views DOI Abstract
2018
Characteristics of Medicaid recipients in Methadone Maintenance Treatment: A comparison across the lifespan.
Vol. 92 , pp. 40-45
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of referral to expedited Medicaid on substance use treatment utilization among people with serious mental illness released from prison.
Vol. 99 , pp. 9-15
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing the impact of drug courts on provider-directed marketing efforts by manufactures of medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
Vol. 110 , pp. 49-58
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expanding treatment for opioid use disorder in publicly funded primary care clinics: Exploratory evaluation of the NYC health + hospitals buprenorphine ECHO program.
Vol. 106 , pp. 1-3
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gabapentin prescribed during substance abuse treatment: The perspective of treatment providers.
Vol. 105 , pp. 1-4
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Provider-directed marketing may increase prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder.
Vol. 104 , pp. 104-115
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing the impact of drug courts on provider-directed marketing efforts by manufactures of medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
Vol. 110 , pp. 49-58
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of referral to expedited Medicaid on substance use treatment utilization among people with serious mental illness released from prison.
Vol. 99 , pp. 9-15
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Establishing the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a multi-component behavioral intervention to reduce pain and substance use and improve physical performance in older persons living with HIV.
Vol. 100 , pp. 29-38
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expanding treatment for opioid use disorder in publicly funded primary care clinics: Exploratory evaluation of the NYC health + hospitals buprenorphine ECHO program.
Vol. 106 , pp. 1-3
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City.
Vol. 106 , pp. 79-88
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of drug court participation on mortality: 15-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 105 , pp. 12-18
214 views DOI Abstract
2019
U.S. alcohol treatment admissions after the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act: Do state parity laws and race/ethnicity make a difference?
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Provider-directed marketing may increase prescribing of medications for opioid use disorder.
Vol. 104 , pp. 104-115
328 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,718 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.