The impact of drug court participation on mortality: 15-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
Clicks: 212
ID: 24465
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
69.5
/100
212 views
163 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #13 of 13 articles by views in journal of substance abuse treatment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To test the effects of drug court participation on long-term mortality risk.During 1997-98, 235 individuals charged with a non-violent offense were randomly assigned to Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court (BCDTC) or traditional adjudication. Heroin was the predominant substance of choice among the sample. Participant mortality was observed for 15 years following randomization.Over 20% of participants died during the study, at an average age of 46.6 years, and 64.4% of deaths were substance-use related. Survival analyses estimated that neither mortality from any cause nor from substance use-related causes significantly differed between BCDTC and traditional adjudication.Frequent and premature death among the sample indicates that this is a high-risk population in need of effective substance use treatment. Roughly half of drug treatment courts are now estimated to offer medication assisted treatment (MAT), which is currently the most effective treatment for opioid use disorders. In this study of BCDTC implemented over 15 years ago, only 7% of participants received MAT, which may explain the lack of program impact on mortality. Historical barriers to providing MAT in drug court settings include access, concerns about diversion, negative attitudes, blanket prohibitions, and stigma. Drug treatment courts should implement best practice standards for substance use treatment and overdose prevention, including increased access to MAT and naloxone, and training to reduce stigmatizing language and practice.
| Reference Key |
kearley2019thejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kearley, Brook W;Cosgrove, John A;Wimberly, Alexandra S;Gottfredson, Denise C; |
| Journal | journal of substance abuse treatment |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0740-5472(19)30018-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.