crystals | Journament

Journal Ranking

#367 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

crystals

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim
Short Name crystals
Abbreviated Name crystals
ISSN 2073-4352
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2015
development of glucose biosensor based on zno nanoparticles film and glucose oxidase-immobilized eggshell membrane
;Bohari Noor Aini;Shafiquzzaman Siddiquee;Kamaruzaman Ampon;Kenneth Francis Rodrigues;Saallah Suryani
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 46-56
658 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thermochemically Stable Liquid-Crystalline Gold(I) Complexes Showing Enhanced Room Temperature Phosphorescence
Kuroda, Yuki;Nakamura, Shin-ya;Srinivas, Katam;Sathyanarayana, Arruri;Prabusankar, Ganesan;Hisano, Kyohei;Tsutsumi, Osamu;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 227-
445 views Abstract
2017
Ivabradine Hydrochloride (S)-Mandelic Acid Co-Crystal: In Situ Preparation during Formulation
Sládková, Veronika;Dammer, Ondřej;Sedmak, Gregor;Skořepová, Eliška;Kratochvíl, Bohumil;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
368 views Abstract
2020
Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Evaluation of Chromium Oxide Deposited on Titania–Silica Mesoporous Nanocomposite for the Ethane Dehydrogenation with CO2
Abdulrhman S. Al-Awadi,Ahmed Mohamed El-Toni,Saeed M. Al-Zahrani,Ahmed E. Abasaeed,Aslam Khan;Abdulrhman S. Al-Awadi;Ahmed Mohamed El-Toni;Saeed M. Al-Zahrani;Ahmed E. Abasaeed;Aslam Khan;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 322-
316 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of Stacking Fault Energy on Microstructure and Texture Evolution during the Rolling of Non-Equiatomic CrMnFeCoNi High-Entropy Alloys
G. Dan Sathiaraj;Rajib Kalsar;Satyam Suwas;Werner Skrotzki;Sathiaraj, G. Dan;Kalsar, Rajib;Suwas, Satyam;Skrotzki, Werner;
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 607-
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Relationship among Initial Texture, Deformation Mechanism, Mechanical Properties, and Texture Evolution during Uniaxial Compression of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy
Hui Su;Zhibing Chu;Chun Xue;Yugui Li;Lifeng Ma;Su, Hui;Chu, Zhibing;Xue, Chun;Li, Yugui;Ma, Lifeng;
Vol. 10 , No. 9 , pp. 738-
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fabrication of Pyramid Structure Substrate Utilized for Epitaxial Growth Free-Standing GaN
Yu, Ruixian;Zhang, Baoguo;Zhang, Lei;Wu, Yongzhong;Hu, Haixiao;Liu, Lei;Shao, Yongliang;Hao, Xiaopeng;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 547-
282 views Abstract
2020
Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Evaluation of Chromium Oxide Deposited on Titania–Silica Mesoporous Nanocomposite for the Ethane Dehydrogenation with CO2
Abdulrhman S. Al-Awadi;Ahmed Mohamed El-Toni;Saeed M. Al-Zahrani;Ahmed E. Abasaeed;Aslam Khan;Al-Awadi, Abdulrhman S.;El-Toni, Ahmed Mohamed;Al-Zahrani, Saeed M.;Abasaeed, Ahmed E.;Khan, Aslam;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 322-
280 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Effects of Rare Earth Pr and Heat Treatment on the Wear Properties of AZ91 Alloy
Li, Ning;Yan, Hong;
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 256-
276 views Abstract
2018
Analysis of Waveguides on Lithium Niobate Thin Films
Wang, Yiwen;Chen, Zhihua;Hu, Hui;
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 191-
257 views Abstract
View All 46 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.