journal of hospitality and tourism management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5209 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

journal of hospitality and tourism management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name journal of hospitality and tourism management
Abbreviated Name journal of hospitality and tourism management
ISSN 1447-6770
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hospitality-and-tourism-management
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (89 total)

2020
Merging the norm activation model and the theory of planned behavior in the context of drone food delivery services: Does the level of product knowledge really matter?
Kim, J.
Vol. 42 , pp. 1-11
502 views DOI
2019
Is political skill really an antidote in the workplace incivility-emotional exhaustion and outcome relationship in the hotel industry?
Karatepe O.
Vol. 40 , pp. 40-49
334 views DOI
2019
Proactive personality and job crafting in the tourism industry: Does job resourcefulness matter?
Teng, H.
Vol. 41 , pp. 110-116
289 views DOI
2014
dynamic processes in prochiral solvating agents (pro-csas) studied by nmr spectroscopy
;Jan Labuta;Shinsuke Ishihara;Katsuhiko Ariga;Jonathan P. Hill
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 345-367
271 views DOI Abstract
2018
stability study of etoricoxib a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor by a new single and rapid reversed phase hplc method
;Muhammad Alzweiri;Mariam Sallam;Walid Al-Zyoud;Khaled Aiedeh
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 288-
267 views DOI Abstract
2018
carbon oxides gases for occupancy counting and emergency control in fog environment
;Kairong Duan;Simon Fong;Yan Zhuang;Wei Song
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 66-
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
cloud-based parameter-driven statistical services and resource allocation in a heterogeneous platform on enterprise environment
;Sungju Lee;Taikyeong Jeong
Vol. 8 , No. 10 , pp. 103-
255 views DOI Abstract
2013
frame transformation relations and symmetry analysis of fluxional symmetric rotor dimers
;William G. Harter;Harrison B. Chen;Bumgyunmiga Choi;Horace T. Crogman
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 86-118
254 views DOI Abstract
2010
miscellania about entropy, energy, and available free energy
;Ingo Müller
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 916-934
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
convergence analysis of self-adaptive inertial extra-gradient method for solving a family of pseudomonotone equilibrium problems with application
;Thanatporn Bantaojai;Nuttapol Pakkaranang;Habib ur Rehman;Poom Kumam;Wiyada Kumam
Vol. 12 , No. 1332 , pp. 1332-
250 views DOI Abstract
View All 89 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.