Indexed in Journament

academy of management review

ISSN 0363-7425· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,273 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
116 Articles
Scores higher than 3.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kurzname academy of management review
Abgekürzter Name academy of management review
ISSN 0363-7425
URL http://aom.org/amr

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for academy of management review
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 2.1 11.5
Content Distribution 29.1 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (116)

2021
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
1,456 views DOI
2016
analysis of assistance procedures to normal birth in primiparous
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 30-35
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
intestinal obstruction for biliary lithiasis: case report
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 97-99
345 views DOI Abstract
2012
vaginal delivery after one cesarean section
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 135-146
334 views Abstract
2015
the effect of body mass index in lung volumes and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 58-61
310 views Abstract
2015
prevalence of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in students of faculdade de ciências médicas e da saúde da puc-sp
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 73-79
308 views Abstract
2018
topical analgesia study after deep chemical peeling utilizing water, melaleuca oil and gel mask in comparison of saline solution mask
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 29-32
305 views DOI Abstract
2011
treatment and partial recovery of ischemic stroke hemiplegy through acupuncture
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 24-27
274 views Abstract
2021
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
1,456 views DOI
2018
gorlin-goltz syndrome: case report
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 59-62
23 views DOI Abstract
2018
topical analgesia study after deep chemical peeling utilizing water, melaleuca oil and gel mask in comparison of saline solution mask
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 29-32
305 views DOI Abstract
2018
undifferentiated lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of nasopharynx: rare tumor initiated with otitis media with effusion
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 48-50
226 views DOI Abstract
2018
carcinoma of renal papillary type 2 cells of infrequent presentation: case report
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 44-47
79 views DOI Abstract
2017
indications of cesarean births in hospitals affiliate to the unified health system: low and high risks
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 67-71
229 views DOI Abstract
2017
intestinal obstruction for biliary lithiasis: case report
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 97-99
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
emergency mobile care service: trauma epidemiology in prehospital care
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 72-75
211 views DOI Abstract
2017
spirituality and the course of patients submitted to chemotherapy
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 81-85
221 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
23.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,273 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

29.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.