analysis of assistance procedures to normal birth in primiparous

Clicks: 299
ID: 137817
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Introduction: Current medical technologies in care in birth increased maternal and fetal benefits persist, despite numerous unnecessary procedures. The purpose of the normal childbirth care is to have healthy women and newborns, using a minimum of safe interventions. Objective: To analyze the assistance to normal delivery in secondary care maternity. Methodology: A total of 100 primiparous mothers who had vaginal delivery were included, in which care practices used were categorized: 1) according to the WHO classification for assistance to normal childbirth: effective, harmful, used with caution and used inappropriately; 2) associating calculations with the Bologna Index parameters: presence of a birth partner, partograph, no stimulation of labor, delivery in non-supine position, and mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact. Results: Birth partners (85%), correctly filled partographs (62%), mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact (36%), use of oxytocin (87%), use of parenteral nutrition during labor (86%) and at delivery (74%), episiotomy (94%) and uterine fundal pressure in the expulsion stage (58%). The overall average value of the Bologna Index of the mothers analyzed was 1.95. Conclusions: Some effective procedures recommended by WHO (presence of a birth partner), some effective and mandatory practices were not complied with (partograph completely filled), potentially harmful or ineffective procedures were used (oxytocin in labor/post-partum), as well as inadequate procedures (uterine fundal pressure during the expulsion stage, use of forceps and episiotomy). The maternity’s care model did not offer excellence procedures in natural birth to their mothers in primiparity, (BI=1.95).
Reference Key
novo2016revistaanalysis Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Joe Luiz Vieira Garcia Novo;Débora Goulart Piantino;Olivia Siquera Filogônio;Neil Ferreira Novo
Journal academy of management review
Year 2016
DOI
10.5327/Z1984-4840201624276
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.