computers in human behavior | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1883 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 14 ساعة

computers in human behavior

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
scopus ulakbim soc
الاسم المختصر computers in human behavior
الاسم المختصر computers in human behavior
ISSN 0747-5632
الهدف والنطاق
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-in-human-behavior
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (124 total)

2019
College-aged users behavioral strategies to reduce envy on social networking sites: A cross-cultural investigation
Wenninger H.
Vol. 97 , pp. 10-23
422 views DOI
2019
Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance
Shin, D.
Vol. 98 , pp. 277-284
403 views DOI
2020
Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire
Biduski, D.
Vol. 104 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2020
Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender
Alghamdi, A.
Vol. 102 , pp. 214-222
351 views DOI
2019
The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework
de, Bérail P.
Vol. 99 , pp. 190-204
351 views DOI
2015
knowledge and practices of visual acuity screening by primary school educators
;Yentl M. Juggernath;Stephen E. Knight
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e5
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Text and you might miss it? Snap and you might remember? Exploring “Google effects on memory” and cognitive self-esteem in the context of Snapchat and text messaging
Kahn, A.
Vol. 104 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2019
Do instrumental goal pursuits mediate feelings of envy on Facebook and Happiness or subjective well-being?
Lemay D.
Vol. 91 , pp. 186-191
331 views DOI
2019
Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in early childhood education: A meta-ethnographical synthesis of qualitative research
Mertala, P.
Vol. 101 , pp. 334-349
330 views DOI
2019
A perceived moral agency scale: Development and validation of a metric for humans and social machines
Banks, J.
Vol. 90 , pp. 363-371
316 views DOI
View All 124 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.