computers in human behavior | Journament

Journal Ranking

#267 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 hours ago

computers in human behavior

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name computers in human behavior
Abbreviated Name computers in human behavior
ISSN 0747-5632
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (124 total)

2019
College-aged users behavioral strategies to reduce envy on social networking sites: A cross-cultural investigation
Wenninger H.
Vol. 97 , pp. 10-23
385 views DOI
2020
Assessing long-term user experience on a mobile health application through an in-app embedded conversation-based questionnaire
Biduski, D.
Vol. 104 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2020
Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender
Alghamdi, A.
Vol. 102 , pp. 214-222
324 views DOI
2019
The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: A moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework
de, Bérail P.
Vol. 99 , pp. 190-204
324 views DOI
2020
Text and you might miss it? Snap and you might remember? Exploring “Google effects on memory” and cognitive self-esteem in the context of Snapchat and text messaging
Kahn, A.
Vol. 104 , pp. 0-0
311 views DOI
2015
knowledge and practices of visual acuity screening by primary school educators
;Yentl M. Juggernath;Stephen E. Knight
Vol. 74 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e5
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Do instrumental goal pursuits mediate feelings of envy on Facebook and Happiness or subjective well-being?
Lemay D.
Vol. 91 , pp. 186-191
303 views DOI
2019
Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance
Shin, D.
Vol. 98 , pp. 277-284
288 views DOI
2019
A latent profile analysis of adult students’ online self-regulation in blended learning environments
Vanslambrouck, S.
Vol. 99 , pp. 126-136
283 views DOI
2020
Human moral reasoning types in autonomous vehicle moral dilemma: A cross-cultural comparison of Korea and Canada
Rhim, J.
Vol. 102 , pp. 39-56
276 views DOI
View All 124 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.