Indexed in Journament

journal of business research

ISSN 0148-2963· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,810 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
87 Articles
Scores higher than 52.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of business research
Abbreviated Name journal of business research
ISSN 0148-2963
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 72.1 25.8
Innovation 22.5 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 72.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (87)

2020
Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context
Cambier, F.
Vol. 109 , pp. 260-270
395 views DOI
2019
Applying complexity theory for modeling human resource outcomes: Antecedent configurations indicating perceived location autonomy and work environment choice
Spivack, A.
Vol. 102 , pp. 109-119
386 views DOI
2019
Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance
Broadstock, D.
, pp. 0-0
369 views DOI
2020
Examining the effects of mutual information sharing and relationship empathy: A social penetration theory perspective
Mangus, S.
Vol. 109 , pp. 375-384
359 views DOI
2009
kualitas remaja di kabupaten banyumas
;Ignatius Suksmadi;Ujang Sumarwan;Ali Khomsan;Hartoyo Hartoyo
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 154-159
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis
Khedhaouria, A.
Vol. 101 , pp. 349-361
342 views DOI
2019
Inclusion fairness in accounting, finance, and management: An investigation of A-star publications on the ABDC journal list
Grossmann, A.
Vol. 95 , pp. 232-241
339 views DOI
2019
Keeping the Joneses from getting ahead in the first place: Envy's influence on gift giving behavior
Givi J.
Vol. 101 , pp. 375-388
334 views DOI
2019
Is my company really doing good? Factors influencing employees' evaluation of the authenticity of their company's corporate social responsibility engagement
Schaefer, S.
Vol. 101 , pp. 128-143
324 views DOI
2018
Shopper marketing moderators of the brand equity – behavioral loyalty relationship
Hariharan, V.
Vol. 85 , pp. 91-104
302 views DOI
2022
Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and Wild Markets
Belk, R.
Vol. 153 , pp. 198-205
171 views DOI
2021
How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems
Xie, X.
Vol. 124 , pp. 299-311
169 views DOI
2021
What women want? How contextual product displays influence women's online shopping behavior
González, E.M.
Vol. 123 , pp. 625-641
225 views DOI
2021
Betting on Bitcoin: How social collectives shape cryptocurrency markets
Breidbach, C.F.
Vol. 122 , pp. 311-320
195 views DOI
2021
Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis
Arora, S.D.
Vol. 122 , pp. 60-74
109 views DOI
2021
Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?
Lim, W.M.
Vol. 122 , pp. 534-566
29 views DOI
2020
How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis
Xie, X.
Vol. 108 , pp. 29-41
134 views DOI
2020
Surprise rewards and brand evaluations: The role of intrinsic motivation and reward format
Shibly, S.A.
Vol. 113 , pp. 39-48
244 views DOI
2020
Examining antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness
Alzubaidi, H.
, pp. 0-0
240 views DOI
2020
Group culture, gender diversity and organizational innovativeness: Evidence from Serbia
Colovic, A.
Vol. 110 , pp. 282-291
188 views DOI
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,810 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

22.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.