biological & pharmaceutical bulletin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5488 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

biological & pharmaceutical bulletin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name biol pharm bull
Abbreviated Name biol pharm bull
ISSN 1347-5215
Aim and Scope
URL http://bpb.pharm.or.jp
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2019
seroprevalence for dengue virus in a hyperendemic area and associated socioeconomic and demographic factors using a cross-sectional design and a geostatistical approach, state of são paulo, brazil
;Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto;Rafael Alves da Silva;Nathalia Zini;Gislaine Celestino Dutra da Silva;Natal Santos da Silva;Maisa Carla Pereira Parra;Margareth Regina Dibo;Cassia Fernanda Estofolete;Eliane Aparecida Fávaro;Karina Rocha Dutra;Manlio Tasso Oliveira Mota;Georgia Freitas Guimarães;Ana Carolina Bernardes Terzian;Marta Blangiardo;Mauricio Lacerda Nogueira
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
643 views DOI Abstract
2013
asymptomatic primary tuberculous pleurisy with intense 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake mimicking malignant mesothelioma
;Shinohara Tsutomu;Shiota Naoki;Kume Motohiko;Hamada Norihiko;Naruse Keishi;Ogushi Fumitaka
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 12-
637 views DOI Abstract
1995
Inhibitory effect of pyridobenzazoles on virus replication in vitro
Chiba T;Shigeta S;Numazaki Y;;
Vol. 18 , No. 8 , pp. -
367 views Abstract
2017
values, preferences and current hepatitis b and c testing practices in low- and middle-income countries: results of a survey of end users and implementers
;Elena Ivanova Reipold;Alessandra Trianni;Douglas Krakower;Stefano Ongarello;Teri Roberts;Philippa Easterbrook;Claudia Denkinger
Vol. 17 , No. S1 , pp. 149-157
328 views DOI Abstract
2007
concurrent acute illness and comorbid conditions poorly predict antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections: a cross-sectional analysis
;Perencevich Eli N;Zuckerman Ilene H;Harris Anthony D
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 47-
319 views DOI Abstract
2013
epidemiology and clinical presentation of the four human parainfluenza virus types
;Liu Wen-Kuan;Liu Qian;Chen De-Hui;Liang Huan-Xi;Chen Xiao-Kai;Huang Wen-Bo;Qin Sheng;Yang Zi-Feng;Zhou Rong
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 28-
301 views DOI Abstract
2015
Saturated Metabolism of Voriconazole N-Oxidation Resulting in Nonlinearity of Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole at Clinical Doses.
Yamada, Takahiro;Mino, Yasuaki;Yagi, Tatsuya;Naito, Takafumi;Kawakami, Junichi;
Vol. 38 , No. 10 , pp. 1496-503
264 views DOI Abstract
2011
trem-1 expression on neutrophils and monocytes of septic patients: relation to the underlying infection and the implicated pathogen
;Poukoulidou Thekla;Spyridaki Aikaterini;Mihailidou Ira;Kopterides Petros;Pistiki Aikaterini;Alexiou Zoi;Chrisofos Michael;Dimopoulou Ioanna;Drimoussis Panagiotis;Giamarellos-Bourboulis Evangelos J;Koutelidakis Ioannis;Marioli Androniki;Mega Anna;Orfanos Stylianos E;Theodorakopoulou Maria;Tsironis Christos;Maggina Nina;Polychronopoulos Vlassios;Tsangaris Iraklis
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 309-
220 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.