Indexed in Journament

journal of european psychology students

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.8/100
Journament Score
#7,881
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name journal of european psychology students
Abbreviated Name journal of european psychology students

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2008
can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3d models?
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
650 views DOI Abstract
2010
screensaver: an open source lab information management system (lims) for high throughput screening facilities
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 260-
454 views DOI Abstract
2010
multivariate meta-analysis of proteomics data from human prostate and colon tumours
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 468-
413 views DOI Abstract
2007
identification of dna-binding proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary profiles
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 463-
412 views DOI Abstract
2006
transcriptomic response to differentiation induction
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 81-
404 views DOI Abstract
2008
i-tasser server for protein 3d structure prediction
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 40-
372 views DOI Abstract
2011
popmusic 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
sim1000g: a user-friendly genetic variant simulator in r for unrelated individuals and family-based designs
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
single-cell gene expression analysis reveals β-cell dysfunction and deficit mechanisms in type 2 diabetes
Vol. 19 , No. S19 , pp. 37-48
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
sim1000g: a user-friendly genetic variant simulator in r for unrelated individuals and family-based designs
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
single-cell gene expression analysis reveals β-cell dysfunction and deficit mechanisms in type 2 diabetes
Vol. 19 , No. S19 , pp. 37-48
317 views DOI Abstract
2015
Giving Work a Rain Check: Relationship Between Soldiering and Positive Work Outcomes Within the Job Demands-Resources Model
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 90-94
234 views Abstract
2014
2011
popmusic 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-
369 views DOI Abstract
2010
screensaver: an open source lab information management system (lims) for high throughput screening facilities
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 260-
454 views DOI Abstract
2010
a comparative study of conservation and variation scores
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 388-
258 views DOI Abstract
2010
multivariate meta-analysis of proteomics data from human prostate and colon tumours
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 468-
413 views DOI Abstract
2010
a computational screen for site selective a-to-i editing detects novel sites in neuron specific hu proteins
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
274 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.