journal of european psychology students | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3277 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of european psychology students

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of european psychology students
Abbreviated Name journal of european psychology students
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2008
can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3d models?
;Gibrat Jean-François;Marin Antoine;Taly Jean-François
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
626 views DOI Abstract
2010
screensaver: an open source lab information management system (lims) for high throughput screening facilities
;Nale Jennifer;Rudnicki Stewart;Rudnicki Katrina;Chiang Su L;Wrobel David;Erickson Sean D;Sullivan John P;Tolopko Andrew N;Selfors Laura M;Greenhouse Dara;Muhlich Jeremy L;Shamu Caroline E
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 260-
433 views DOI Abstract
2007
identification of dna-binding proteins using support vector machines and evolutionary profiles
;Gromiha Michael M;Kumar Manish;Raghava Gajendra PS
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 463-
389 views DOI Abstract
2006
transcriptomic response to differentiation induction
;Dimitrov DS;Lempicki RA;Xiao X;Sidorov IA;Stephens R;Patton GW;Shoemaker RH;Tudor G
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 81-
382 views DOI Abstract
2010
multivariate meta-analysis of proteomics data from human prostate and colon tumours
;Lehtiö Janne;Auer Gert;Franzén Bo;Rosenberg Lina;Forshed Jenny
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 468-
372 views DOI Abstract
2011
popmusic 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality
;Rooman Marianne;Gilis Dimitri;Kwasigroch Jean;Dehouck Yves
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-
354 views DOI Abstract
2008
i-tasser server for protein 3d structure prediction
;Zhang Yang
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 40-
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
sim1000g: a user-friendly genetic variant simulator in r for unrelated individuals and family-based designs
;Apostolos Dimitromanolakis;Jingxiong Xu;Agnieszka Krol;Laurent Briollais
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
307 views DOI Abstract
2018
single-cell gene expression analysis reveals β-cell dysfunction and deficit mechanisms in type 2 diabetes
;Lichun Ma;Jie Zheng
Vol. 19 , No. S19 , pp. 37-48
296 views DOI Abstract
2015
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Danish Soldiers 2.5 Years after Military Deployment in Afghanistan: The Role of Personality Traits as Predisposing Risk Factors
Nielsen, Janne Hellerup;Andersen, Soeren Bo;Hogh, Annie;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
290 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.