russian journal of agricultural and socio-economic sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4627 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

russian journal of agricultural and socio-economic sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name russian journal of agricultural and socio-economic sciences
Abbreviated Name russian journal of agricultural and socio-economic sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
poultry population dynamics and mortality risks in smallholder farms of the mekong river delta region
;Alexis Delabouglise;Benjamin Nguyen-Van-Yen;Nguyen Thi Le Thanh;Huynh Thi Ai Xuyen;Phung Ngoc Tuyet;Ha Minh Lam;Maciej F. Boni
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP AGILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT TOWARD ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS FOR CHANGES IN PUBLIC ISLAMIC UNIVERSITIES OF CENTRAL JAVA IN CONDITIONS OF VUCA ERA
A.K., Diharto;
Vol. 91 , No. 7 , pp. 206-211
417 views Abstract
2019
THE EFFECT OF MANDATORY IFRS ADOPTION ON EARNING MANAGEMENT AND POLITICAL CONNECTION AS MODERATION VARIABLES IN COMPANIES LISTED IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE
Y.A.V.W., Wardhana;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 203-215
387 views Abstract
2019
THE EFFECT OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND BIG FIVE PERSONALITY ON ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOUR THROUGH ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF EMPLOYEES AT KUTAI KARTANEGARA TENGGARONG UNIVERSITY
Y., Palinggi;Mawardi, ;Susandy, ;
Vol. 94 , No. 10 , pp. 108-115
371 views Abstract
2019
TESTING THE EFFECTS OF HEALTHCARE ALLOWANCE COMPENSATION ON NURSING PROFESSION AND JOB SATISFACTION ON WORK PERFORMANCE THROUGH ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A STUDY ON NURSING PROFESSION AT TYPE-A HOSPITALS IN JAKARTA AREA
R., Prasetya;T.Y.R., Syah;
Vol. 89 , No. 5 , pp. 119-129
351 views Abstract
2019
a longitudinal assessment of periodontal disease in yorkshire terriers
;Corrin Wallis;Ilaria Pesci;Alison Colyer;Lisa Milella;Peter Southerden;Lucy J. Holcombe;Neil Desforges
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
346 views DOI Abstract
2012
ASSESSMENT OF DIVERSIFIED VEGETATION COMMUNITY IN ISLAMABAD VICINITY, PAKISTAN
Akram, M.;Abbasi, G.H.;Ahmad, M.;Ahmad, I.;Jamil, M.;Hussain, T.;Ashraf, I.;Raza, M.A. Sammar;
Vol. 12 , No. 12 , pp. 37-40
337 views Abstract
2013
lead toxicosis of captive vultures: case description and responses to chelation therapy
;Pikula Jiri;Hajkova Pavlina;Bandouchova Hana;Bednarova Ivana;Adam Vojtech;Beklova Miroslava;Kral Jiri;Ondracek Karel;Osickova Jitka;Pohanka Miroslav;Sedlackova Jana;Skochova Hana;Sobotka Jakub;Treml Frantisek;Kizek Rene
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
CAPITAL STRUCTURE VARIABLES OF PECKING ORDER THEORY PERSPECTIVE IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE
K., Epong M. I;P.I.B., Anom;
Vol. 95 , No. 11 , pp. 111-121
323 views Abstract
2019
THE ROLE OF GENDER DIVERSITY ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TAX AVOIDANCE
N.B., Prasetyo;
Vol. 87 , No. 3 , pp. 107-115
311 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.