Indexed in Journament

ieee transactions on medical imaging

ISSN 1558-254X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.1/100
Journament Score
#3,882
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ieee trans med imaging
Abbreviated Name ieee transactions on medical imaging
ISSN 1558-254X
URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=42

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2017
new algorithms for identifying the flavour of $${\mathrm {b}} ^0$$ b 0 mesons using pions and protons
Vol. 77 , No. 4 , pp. 1-15
479 views DOI Abstract
2019
mDixon-Based Synthetic CT Generation for PET Attenuation Correction on Abdomen and Pelvis Jointly Using Transfer Fuzzy Clustering and Active Learning-Based Classification.
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dynamic In Vivo Chest X-ray Dark-Field Imaging in Mice
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 649-656
377 views DOI
2018
Blind Source Separation-Based Motion Detector for Imaging Super-Paramagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) Particles in Magnetomotive Ultrasound Imaging.
Vol. 37 , No. 10 , pp. 2356-2366
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatic Collateral Scoring from 3D CTA Images.
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Explainable Anatomical Shape Analysis through Deep Hierarchical Generative Models.
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automated Tortuosity Analysis of Nerve Fibers in Corneal Confocal Microscopy.
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Images.
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automated Tortuosity Analysis of Nerve Fibers in Corneal Confocal Microscopy.
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
Explainable Anatomical Shape Analysis through Deep Hierarchical Generative Models.
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatic Collateral Scoring from 3D CTA Images.
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
motion and collision of particles near dst black holes
Vol. 79 , No. 6 , pp. 1-14
208 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dynamic In Vivo Chest X-ray Dark-Field Imaging in Mice
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 649-656
377 views DOI
2019
Quadratic Autoencoder (Q-AE) for Low-dose CT Denoising.
242 views DOI Abstract
2019
mDixon-Based Synthetic CT Generation for PET Attenuation Correction on Abdomen and Pelvis Jointly Using Transfer Fuzzy Clustering and Active Learning-Based Classification.
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Images.
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
One-Shot Generative Adversarial Learning for MRI Segmentation of Craniomaxillofacial Bony Structures.
187 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.