Heliyon | Journament

Journal Ranking

#13 / 33,721
⭐ Average
Overall Score
57.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
70
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

Heliyon

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name Heliyon
Abbreviated Name heliyon
ISSN 2405-8440
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (235 total)

2019
Implications of oil price shocks on net oil-importing African countries.
Gershon, Obindah;Ezenwa, Nnaemeka Emmanuel;Osabohien, Romanus;
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. e02208
759 views DOI Abstract
2019
EXABCal: A program for calculating photon exposure and energy absorption buildup factors
Olarinoye, I.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
544 views DOI
2019
An investigation into per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in nineteen Australian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).
Coggan, Timothy L;Moodie, Damien;Kolobaric, Adam;Szabo, Drew;Shimeta, Jeff;Crosbie, Nicholas D;Lee, Elliot;Fernandes, Milena;Clarke, Bradley O;
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. e02316
512 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public health interventions for chronic diseases: cost-benefit modelizations for eradicating chronic kidney disease of multifactorial origin (CKDmfo/ CKDu) from tropical countries.
Wimalawansa, Sunil J;
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. e02309
506 views DOI Abstract
2019
Potential of L as a nutraceutical in human and veterinary medicine.
Raina, Rajinder;Verma, Pawan K;Peshin, Rajinder;Kour, Harpreet;
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. e02376
492 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics on soil erosion and sediment yield in Ethiopia.
Kidane, Moges;Bezie, Alemu;Kesete, Nega;Tolessa, Terefe;
Vol. 5 , No. 12 , pp. e02981
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Shaping values with "YouTube freedoms": linguistic representation and axiological charge of the popular science IT-discourse.
Shiryaeva, Tatyana;Arakelova, Amaliya;Golubovskaya, Elena;Mekeko, Nataliya;
Vol. 5 , No. 12 , pp. e02988
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of dance activities on patients with chronic pathologies: scoping review.
Bruyneel, Anne-Violette;
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. e02104
465 views DOI Abstract
2020
Global analysis of clinical trials with probiotics.
Dronkers, Theresia M G;Ouwehand, Arthur C;Rijkers, Ger T;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. e04467
458 views DOI Abstract
2020
Green corrosion inhibition and adsorption characteristics of leaf extract on mild steel in hydrochloric acid environment.
Ogunleye, O O;Arinkoola, A O;Eletta, O A;Agbede, O O;Osho, Y A;Morakinyo, A F;Hamed, J O;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e03205
455 views DOI Abstract
View All 235 Articles
57
Overall
Average
86
15
30
70
55
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

57.0/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.