revista de psicología | Journament

Journal Ranking

#472 / 33,811
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 hours ago

revista de psicología

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name revista de psicología
Abbreviated Name revista de psicología
ISSN 0254-9247
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2016
early initiation of breast feeding but not bottle feeding increase exclusive breastfeeding practice among less than six months infant in indonesia
;Suparmi Suparmi;Ika Saptarini
Vol. 7 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 44-48
738 views Abstract
2016
herbal therapy and quality of life in hypertension patients at health facilities providing complementary therapy
;Nurhayati Nurhayati;Lucie Widowati
Vol. 7 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 32-36
569 views Abstract
2016
knowledge, attitudes and practice of pharmacovigilance among health care professionals in indonesia
;Grace Wangge;Wafridha Akbar
Vol. 7 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 59-63
415 views Abstract
2016
dextran sulphate crowding and sodium deoxycholate lysis of primary breast fibroblast cells achieve extracellular matrix deposition and decellularization for breast cancer stem cell culture
;Aroem Naruni;Aulia Ornella
Vol. 6 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 43-47
291 views Abstract
2013
Transformaciones familiares: desafío para la educación del siglo XXI
Jadue, Gladys;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 272-289
273 views Abstract
2002
Abnormal daily situations and negative affects in Peru
León, Ramón;
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 119-155
270 views Abstract
2012
why do people choose to purchase generic antibiotics?
;Thianti Sylviningrum;Femi Widiastuti
Vol. 1 , No. 1 Des , pp. 33-36
256 views DOI Abstract
2014
parity, education level and risk for (pre-) eclampsia in selected hospitals in jakarta
;Cicih Opitasari;Lelly Andayasari
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 35-39
250 views DOI Abstract
2012
mapping of leptospirosis risk factor based on remote sensing image in tembalang, semarang city, central java
;Sunaryo Sunaryo;Dyah Widiastuti
Vol. 3 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 45-50
250 views DOI Abstract
2014
the use of antibiotics in hospitalized adult typhoid patients in an indonesian hospital
;Anggita Bunga Anggraini;Cicih Opitasari;Qurrotul Aini M. P. Sari
Vol. 5 , No. 1 Jun , pp. 40-43
232 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.