australian health review : a publication of the australian hospital association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1734 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

australian health review : a publication of the australian hospital association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name aust health rev
Abbreviated Name aust health rev
ISSN 0156-5788
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.publish.csiro.au/ah
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
First steps towards price transparency: comparability of online out-of-pocket tools from Australian private health funds.
Chalmers, Kelsey;Elshaug, Adam G;Larkin, Shaun;
413 views DOI Abstract
2015
Pre-entry student clinical placement demand: can it be met?
McBride, Liza-Jane;Fitzgerald, Cate;Morrison, Laura;Hulcombe, Julie;
Vol. 39 , No. 5 , pp. 577-581
350 views DOI Abstract
2013
odun yüzeylerinin bazı yeni nesil emprenye maddeleri ve Üst yüzey İşlemleri ile açık hava etkilerine karşı korunması
;Ozlem Ozgen;Ümit Yıldız;Sibel Yıldız
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 203-215
347 views Abstract
2000
Corporate governance of public health services: lessons from New Zealand for the state sector.
Perkins, R;Barnett, P;Powell, M;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 9-21
291 views Abstract
2013
effect of altitude and aspect on wood-water relations of beech (fagus orientalis lipsky.) wood
;Elif Topaloğlu;Nurgül Ay; Lokman Altun
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 180-190
245 views Abstract
2004
determination of seed germination, other seed and seedling characteristics of syrian juniper (arceuthosdrupacea (labill.) ant. et kotschy.) and some recommendations
;H. Cemal Gültekin;Ü. Gülşan Gültekin;Alime Divrik
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 48-54
243 views Abstract
2002
forest and forestry in japan
;Turan Yüksek
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 33-41
231 views Abstract
2000
a research based on quality management in forest products industry (a sample of blacksea region)
;Hicabi Cındık;Yener Top;Selman Karayılmazlar;Kadri Cemil Akyüz
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 53-58
226 views Abstract
2012
the open space sculptures used in the gençlik park towards visual perception of park users
;Ahmet Polat;Banu Kurtaslan; Esra Peker
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 170-180
212 views Abstract
2001
the planning of wood transport on the forest roads
;H. Hulusi Acar;Habip Eroğlu
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 61-66
196 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.