Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7508 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Zoo Wildl Med
Abbreviated Name j zoo wildl med
ISSN 1042-7260
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2020
SAFETY OF AND HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSE TO THE MERIAL RECOMBITEK CANINE DISTEMPER VIRUS VACCINE IN MANED WOLVES ().
Barrett, Colleen A;Joyner, Priscilla H;Anis, Eman;Wilkes, Rebecca P;Aitken-Palmer, Copper;
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 972-975
303 views DOI Abstract
2013
Respiratory disease in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in Rwanda, 1990-2010: outbreaks, clinical course, and medical management.
Spelman, Lucy H;Gilardi, Kirsten V K;Lukasik-Braum, Magdalena;Kinani, Jean-Felix;Nyirakaragire, Elisabeth;Lowenstine, Linda J;Cranfield, Michael R;
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 1027-35
271 views Abstract
2020
TUBERCULOSIS CAUSED BY IN A GREATER ONE-HORNED RHINOCEROS (): FIRST REPORT IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.
Love, David M;Garner, Michael M;Lyashchenko, Konstantin P;Sikar-Gang, Alina;Bradway, Daniel S;Robbe-Austerman, Suelee;Miller, Michele;Ramer, Jan;
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 1000-1004
263 views DOI Abstract
2021
ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO EPSILON TOXIN OF IN CAPTIVE ADULT SPRINGBOK (), IMPALA (), ALPACA (), AND RED-NECKED WALLABY () OVER A YEAR.
Rousselet, Estelle;Tarin, Beatrice;Petit, Thierry;Blanc, Barbara;Ortiz, Katia;Haelewyn, Franck;Chenet, Baptiste;Leclerc, Antoine;
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 192-199
258 views DOI Abstract
2021
PREVALENCE OF SPECIES, AND IN THE FECES OF HEALTHY ELEPHANTS ( SPECIES AND ) IN EUROPE.
Scharling, Frederik Stig;Bertelsen, Mads Frost;Sós, Endre;Bojesen, Anders Miki;
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 752-760
234 views DOI Abstract
2026
TRIM22-mediated ubiquitin-dependent degradation of FLT3-ITD overcomes TKI resistance in acute myeloid leukemia
M J Liu, Xiaoqian Wang, Xiaqin He, Xiaoguang Xu, Jing Chen, J H Liu, Shan Jiang, Sijia Li, Si Wang, Ying Liu, Jing Feng, Xin Xu, Miaoyin Luo, Zhiyi Li, Yining Zhang, Yingli Wu, J Hu, Xiaoqin Wang
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
The entropic view of aging: from thermodynamics to biology
Zeming Wu, Si Wang, Moshi Song, Wei Zhang, Jing Qu, J C Izpisua Belmonte, Guang-Hui Liu
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Metaphor to Metric: The Entropic Framework as a Unifying Theory of Aging
Yu Chen, Zhiyong Mao
7 views DOI
2026
SIRT1 deacetylates PKM2 to constrain lactate production and protect against premature ovarian insufficiency
Xiangrong Cui, Chongyang Han, Puhua Zhang, Ruotong Ju, Ruixiang Zhu, Jiali Luo, Li Peng, Chenyu Jia, Xinyu Zhu, Shu Wang, Huihui Li, Tingting Xue, Meng Zou, Xueqing Wu, Xuan Jing
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
The ancient viral whispers of ageing: awakening the dark genome
Haitao Zhang, Guang-Hui Liu, Jing Qu
3 views DOI
View All 12 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.