Indexed in Journament

Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians

ISSN 1042-7260· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,059 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 58.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Zoo Wildl Med
Abbreviated Name j zoo wildl med
ISSN 1042-7260

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 80.0
Innovation 24.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 22.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 80.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 24.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.2
Content Distribution 22.9 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
SAFETY OF AND HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSE TO THE MERIAL RECOMBITEK CANINE DISTEMPER VIRUS VACCINE IN MANED WOLVES ().
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 972-975
346 views DOI Abstract
2013
Respiratory disease in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in Rwanda, 1990-2010: outbreaks, clinical course, and medical management.
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 1027-35
309 views Abstract
2021
ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO EPSILON TOXIN OF IN CAPTIVE ADULT SPRINGBOK (), IMPALA (), ALPACA (), AND RED-NECKED WALLABY () OVER A YEAR.
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 192-199
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
TUBERCULOSIS CAUSED BY IN A GREATER ONE-HORNED RHINOCEROS (): FIRST REPORT IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 1000-1004
296 views DOI Abstract
2021
PREVALENCE OF SPECIES, AND IN THE FECES OF HEALTHY ELEPHANTS ( SPECIES AND ) IN EUROPE.
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 752-760
266 views DOI Abstract
2026
The entropic view of aging: from thermodynamics to biology
55 views DOI Abstract
2026
TRIM22-mediated ubiquitin-dependent degradation of FLT3-ITD overcomes TKI resistance in acute myeloid leukemia
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
The ancient viral whispers of ageing: awakening the dark genome
35 views DOI
2026
Tumor cell–specific exon 3‑deleted FOXP3 isoform promotes growth and metastasis via STAT3 in non‑small cell lung cancer
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bile acids as a “new hormone” in aging-related liver disease
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Metabolic disorders and osteoarthritis: novel insights into pathological mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
A framework of biomarkers for renal aging: a consensus statement by the Aging Biomarker Consortium
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cross-species metabolic profiling of follicular compartments in obesity
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Tumor cell–specific exon 3‑deleted FOXP3 isoform promotes growth and metastasis via STAT3 in non‑small cell lung cancer
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
LoopID reveals condensate-mediated enhancer–promoter interaction regulates cell fate
24 views DOI
2026
The ancient viral whispers of ageing: awakening the dark genome
35 views DOI
2026
SIRT1 deacetylates PKM2 to constrain lactate production and protect against premature ovarian insufficiency
26 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,059 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

22.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.