electronic physician | Journament

Journal Ranking

#158 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

electronic physician

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name electron physician
Abbreviated Name electronic physician
ISSN 2008-5842
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (165 total)

2017
Explaining the role of organizational culture on succession-planning at the Ministry of Health and Medical Education: A qualitative study
Mehrtak, Mohammad;Farzaneh, Esmaeil;Habibzadeh, Shahram;Kamran, Aziz;Zandian, Hamed;Mahdavi, Abdollah;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 5806-5813
594 views Abstract
2017
The impact of environmental and demographic factors on nursing job satisfaction
Rahnavard, Farnaz;Sadati, Ahmad Kalateh;Hemmati, Sorror;Ebrahimzade, Najmeh;Sarikhani, Yaser;Heydari, Seyed Taghi;Lankarani, Kamran Bagheri;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 6712-6717
514 views Abstract
2018
high serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by hantaan virus
;Xiude Fan;Huan Deng;Jiao Sang;Na Li;Xiaoge Zhang;Qunying Han;Zhengwen Liu
Vol. 8 , pp. -
420 views DOI Abstract
2016
Epidemiological aspect of scorpion sting in Bandar Abbas, Iran, during 2009–2011
Moosavy, Seyed Hamid;Shahi, Mehran;Rafinejad, Javad;Zare, Shahram;Madani, Abdoulhossain;Navidpour, Shahrokh;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 2286-2290
402 views Abstract
2017
nramp1 and nrampb contribute to resistance against francisella in dictyostelium
;Yannick Brenz;Denise Ohnezeit;Hanne C. Winther-Larsen;Monica Hagedorn
Vol. 7 , pp. -
349 views DOI Abstract
2018
genetic diversity, multidrug resistance, and virulence of citrobacter freundii from diarrheal patients and healthy individuals
;Liyun Liu;Liyun Liu;Daoli Chen;Liqin Liu;Ruiting Lan;Shuai Hao;Wenjie Jin;Hui Sun;Yiting Wang;Ying Liang;Jianguo Xu;Jianguo Xu
Vol. 8 , pp. -
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
further characterization of the capsule-like complex (clc) produced by francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis: protective efficacy and similarity to outer membrane vesicles
;Anna E. Champion;Aloka B. Bandara;Nrusingh Mohapatra;Kelly M. Fulton;Susan M. Twine;Thomas J. Inzana;Thomas J. Inzana
Vol. 8 , pp. -
342 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effect of electronic report writing on the quality of nursing report recording
Heidarizadeh, Khadijeh;Rassouli, Maryam;Manoochehri, Houman;Tafreshi, Mansoureh Zagheri;Ghorbanpour, Reza Kashef;
Vol. 9 , No. 10 , pp. 5439-5445
342 views Abstract
2016
Comparison of the Ministry of Health's tariffs with the cost of radiology services using the activity-based costing method.
Kalhor, Rohollah;Amini, Saeed;Emami, Majid;Kakasoltani, Keivan;Rhamani, Nasim;Kalhor, Leila;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 2018-24
337 views DOI Abstract
2014
transcriptome analysis of vibrio parahaemolyticus in type iii secretion system 1 inducing conditions
;Seth David Nydam;Seth David Nydam;Devendra H. Shah;Devendra H. Shah;Douglas Ruben Call;Douglas Ruben Call
Vol. 4 , pp. -
335 views DOI Abstract
View All 165 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.