chronic rhinosinusitis: potential role of microbial dysbiosis and recommendations for sampling sites
Clicks: 327
ID: 257928
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
78.4
/100
327 views
197 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #28 of 165 articles by views in electronic physician
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 165 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition that affects up to 12% of the human population in developed countries. Previous studies examining the potential role of the sinus bacterial microbiota within CRS infections have found inconsistent results, possibly because of inconsistencies in sampling strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether the sinus microbiome is altered in CRS and additionally if the middle meatus is a suitable representative site for sampling the sinus microbiome. Swab samples were collected from 12 healthy controls and 21 CRS patients, including all eight sinuses for CRS patients and between one and five sinuses for control subjects. The left and right middle meatus and nostril swabs were also collected. Significant differences in the sinus microbiomes between CRS and control samples were revealed using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The genus Escherichia was over-represented in CRS sinuses, and associations between control patients and Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum were also identified. Comparisons of the middle meatuses between groups did not reflect these differences, and the abundance of the genus Escherichia was significantly lower at this location. Additionally, intra-patient variation was lower between sinuses than between sinus and middle meatus, which together with the above results suggests that the middle meatus is not an effective representative sampling site.
| Reference Key |
copeland2018frontierschronic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Elizabeth Copeland;Katherine Leonard;Richard Carney;Justin Kong;Martin Forer;Yuresh Naidoo;Brian G. G. Oliver;Brian G. G. Oliver;Justin R. Seymour;Stephen Woodcock;Catherine M. Burke;Nicholas W. Stow;Nicholas W. Stow |
| Journal | electronic physician |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fcimb.2018.00057
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.