Indexed in Journament

African journal of disability

ISSN 2223-9170· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,145 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 96% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Afr J Disabil
Abbreviated Name afr j disabil
ISSN 2223-9170
URL https://ajod.org/index.php/ajod

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 72.2 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 69.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2015
Teaching science and mathematics to students with visual impairments: Reflections of a visually impaired technician.
Maguvhe, Mbulaheni;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 194
415 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dyslexic learners' experiences with their peers and teachers in special and mainstream primary schools in North-West Province.
Leseyane, Monicca;Mandende, Peter;Makgato, Mary;Cekiso, Madoda;
Vol. 7 , pp. 363
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
How pain management for children with cerebral palsy in South African schools complies with up-to-date knowledge.
Johnson, Ensa;Nilsson, Stefan;Adolfsson, Margareta;
Vol. 8 , pp. 575
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of rehabilitation care workers in South African healthcare: A Q-methodological study.
Gamiet, Shamila;Rowe, Michael;
Vol. 8 , pp. 537
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
A snapshot of the chalkboard writing experiences of Bachelor of Education students with visual disabilities in South Africa.
Subrayen, Roshanthni;Dhunpath, Rubby;
Vol. 8 , pp. 523
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
A defence of identity for persons with disability: Reflections from religion and philosophy versus ancient African culture.
Ojok, Patrick;Musenze, Junior B;
Vol. 8 , pp. 490
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
A university's response to people with disabilities in Worcester, Western Cape.
Müller, Jana V;Ned, Lieketseng;Boshoff, Hananja;
Vol. 8 , pp. 439
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perspectives on a mobile application that maps assistive technology resources in Africa.
Visagie, Surona;Matter, Rebecca;Kayange, George;Chiwaula, Mussa;Harniss, Mark;Kahonde, Callista;
Vol. 8 , pp. 567
358 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exploring the concerns of persons with disabilities in Western Zambia.
Cleaver, Shaun;Polatajko, Helene;Bond, Virginia;Magalhães, Lilian;Nixon, Stephanie;
Vol. 7 , pp. 446
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
modern methods for cost optimization in transport constructions
;Bartos, Miroslav;Urban, Karol;Vitasek, Stanislav
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 24-31
270 views DOI Abstract
2022
Difficulties in teaching Grade 3 learners with reading problems in full-service schools in South Africa.
Phala, Thembi A;Hugo, Anna;
Vol. 11 , pp. 906
51 views DOI Abstract
2022
Evaluating the awareness and knowledge of dyslexia among primary school teachers in Tshwane District, South Africa.
Makgato, Mary M;Leseyane-Kgari, Monicca;Cekiso, Madoda;Mandende, Itani P;Masha, Rose;
Vol. 11 , pp. 807
102 views DOI Abstract
2019
A university's response to people with disabilities in Worcester, Western Cape.
Müller, Jana V;Ned, Lieketseng;Boshoff, Hananja;
Vol. 8 , pp. 439
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of rehabilitation care workers in South African healthcare: A Q-methodological study.
Gamiet, Shamila;Rowe, Michael;
Vol. 8 , pp. 537
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
How pain management for children with cerebral palsy in South African schools complies with up-to-date knowledge.
Johnson, Ensa;Nilsson, Stefan;Adolfsson, Margareta;
Vol. 8 , pp. 575
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
A defence of identity for persons with disability: Reflections from religion and philosophy versus ancient African culture.
Ojok, Patrick;Musenze, Junior B;
Vol. 8 , pp. 490
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
A snapshot of the chalkboard writing experiences of Bachelor of Education students with visual disabilities in South Africa.
Subrayen, Roshanthni;Dhunpath, Rubby;
Vol. 8 , pp. 523
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perspectives on a mobile application that maps assistive technology resources in Africa.
Visagie, Surona;Matter, Rebecca;Kayange, George;Chiwaula, Mussa;Harniss, Mark;Kahonde, Callista;
Vol. 8 , pp. 567
358 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dyslexic learners' experiences with their peers and teachers in special and mainstream primary schools in North-West Province.
Leseyane, Monicca;Mandende, Peter;Makgato, Mary;Cekiso, Madoda;
Vol. 7 , pp. 363
413 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exploring the concerns of persons with disabilities in Western Zambia.
Cleaver, Shaun;Polatajko, Helene;Bond, Virginia;Magalhães, Lilian;Nixon, Stephanie;
Vol. 7 , pp. 446
329 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,145 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.