Indexed in Journament

acta crystallographica section e

ISSN 1600-5368· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,586 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
280 Articles
Scores higher than 77.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name acta crystallographica section e
Abbreviated Name acta crystallographica section e
ISSN 1600-5368
URL https://journals.iucr.org/e

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for acta crystallographica section e
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 67.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 50.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (280)

2006
reflexões éticas acerca dos estudos de soroprevelência de hepatites virais ethical issues about seroprevalence studies on viral hepatitis
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 162-169
637 views DOI Abstract
2017
preliminary experience and possible predictors of successful mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 162-165
547 views DOI Abstract
2012
1,1′-[Imidazolidine-1,3-diylbis(methylene)]bis(1H-benzotriazole)
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. o312-o313
545 views Abstract
2015
a pilot study of the use of fesoterodine in the management of men with refractory overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for bladder outlet obstruction
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 38-40
525 views DOI Abstract
2016
adding gentamicin to fluoroquinolone-based antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy-related infection rate
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 91-95
521 views DOI Abstract
2015
long-term efficacy of fulguration of trigonitis for recurrent urinary tract infections in women
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 197-201
509 views DOI Abstract
2015
management of complex urethral stricture disease: algorithm and experience from a single institute
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 210-213
498 views DOI Abstract
2016
risk of stroke in first-ever acute urinary retention: a 10-year population-based study
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 71-75
492 views DOI Abstract
obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among obese individuals: a cross-sectional study
Vol. 63 , No. 10 , pp. 862-868
472 views DOI Abstract
2017
preliminary experience and possible predictors of successful mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 162-165
547 views DOI Abstract
2017
one step forward
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 57-
24 views DOI
2017
prostate inflammation: a brief review
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 113-118
248 views DOI Abstract
2017
laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy and open surgery
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 36-41
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
safety and efficacy of staged retrograde intrarenal surgery for large stone burden of renal stones in selected patients: a single-center experience
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 94-96
198 views DOI Abstract
2017
moving ahead
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 189-
32 views DOI
2017
clomiphene citrate treatment outcomes in taiwanese hypogonadal men: a single-center preliminary report
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 50-52
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
nephron-sparing management (distal ureterectomy with reimplantation of ureter) for carcinoma of distal ureter: a single-center experience
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 206-209
94 views DOI Abstract
2016
evolution of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in treatment of erectile dysfunction in taiwan
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 66-70
278 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,586 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

67.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.