acta crystallographica section e | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6384 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 23 hours ago

acta crystallographica section e

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj ncbi
Short Name acta crystallographica section e
Abbreviated Name acta crystallographica section e
ISSN 1600-5368
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.iucr.org/e
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (280 total)

2006
reflexões éticas acerca dos estudos de soroprevelência de hepatites virais ethical issues about seroprevalence studies on viral hepatitis
;Rosangela Gaze;Diana Maul de Carvalho;Clara Fumiko Tachibana Yoshida;Luiz Fernando Rangel Tura
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 162-169
586 views DOI Abstract
2015
a pilot study of the use of fesoterodine in the management of men with refractory overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for bladder outlet obstruction
;Bilal Chughtai;Melissa Laudano;Claire Dunphy;Richard Lee;Steven A. Kaplan;Alexis Te
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 38-40
498 views DOI Abstract
2017
preliminary experience and possible predictors of successful mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder
;Tsai-Feng Chen;Hsu-Che Huang;Yu-Hua Lin;Chun-Hou Liao;Bing-Juin Chiang
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 162-165
490 views DOI Abstract
2012
1,1′-[Imidazolidine-1,3-diylbis(methylene)]bis(1H-benzotriazole)
Rivera, Augusto;Quiroga, Diego;Ríos-Motta, Jaime;Fejfarová, Karla;Dušek, Michal;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. o312-o313
485 views Abstract
2015
long-term efficacy of fulguration of trigonitis for recurrent urinary tract infections in women
;Syed A. Hussain;Feras Alhalabi;Philippe E. Zimmern
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 197-201
484 views DOI Abstract
2016
adding gentamicin to fluoroquinolone-based antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy-related infection rate
;Tzuo-Yi Hsieh;Yu-Lin Kao;Shao-Chuan Wang;Wen-Jung Chen;Sung-Lang Chen
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 91-95
479 views DOI Abstract
2012
associação entre doença hepática gordurosa não alcoólica e marcadores de lesão/função hepática com componentes da síndrome metabólica em indivíduos obesos classe iii association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver function/injury markers with metabolic syndrome components in class iii obese individuals
;Gabriela Villaça Chaves;Daiane Spitz de Souza;Silvia Elaine Pereira;Carlos José Saboya;Wilza Arantes Ferreira Peres
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 288-293
477 views DOI Abstract
2016
risk of stroke in first-ever acute urinary retention: a 10-year population-based study
;Chih-Shou Chen;Wei-Yu Lin;Yun-Ching Huang;Pey-Jium Chang;Kuo-Tsai Huang;Dong-Ru Ho
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 71-75
466 views DOI Abstract
obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among obese individuals: a cross-sectional study
;Débora Aparecida Oliveira Modena;Everton Cazzo;Elaine Cristina Cândido;Letícia Baltieri;Luciana Jaroslavsky Bueno da Silveira;Ana Maria Neder de Almeida;Renata Cristina Gobato;Elinton Adami Chaim
Vol. 63 , No. 10 , pp. 862-868
449 views DOI Abstract
2015
management of complex urethral stricture disease: algorithm and experience from a single institute
;Yu-Hua Shau;Sheng-Tang Wu;Chien-Chang Kao;Tai-Lung Cha;Chih-Wei Tsao;En Meng;Dah-Shyong Yu;Guang-Huan Sun;Shou-Hung Tang
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 210-213
447 views DOI Abstract
View All 280 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.