Indexed in Journament

acta crystallographica section e

ISSN 1600-5368· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.2/100
Journament Score
#9,788
Journament Rank
280
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name acta crystallographica section e
Abbreviated Name acta crystallographica section e
ISSN 1600-5368
URL https://journals.iucr.org/e

Indexings

doaj ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (280)

2006
reflexões éticas acerca dos estudos de soroprevelência de hepatites virais ethical issues about seroprevalence studies on viral hepatitis
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 162-169
596 views DOI Abstract
2015
a pilot study of the use of fesoterodine in the management of men with refractory overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for bladder outlet obstruction
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 38-40
506 views DOI Abstract
2012
1,1′-[Imidazolidine-1,3-diylbis(methylene)]bis(1H-benzotriazole)
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. o312-o313
503 views Abstract
2017
preliminary experience and possible predictors of successful mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 162-165
497 views DOI Abstract
2015
long-term efficacy of fulguration of trigonitis for recurrent urinary tract infections in women
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 197-201
490 views DOI Abstract
2016
adding gentamicin to fluoroquinolone-based antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy-related infection rate
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 91-95
488 views DOI Abstract
2016
risk of stroke in first-ever acute urinary retention: a 10-year population-based study
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 71-75
476 views DOI Abstract
2015
management of complex urethral stricture disease: algorithm and experience from a single institute
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 210-213
458 views DOI Abstract
obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among obese individuals: a cross-sectional study
Vol. 63 , No. 10 , pp. 862-868
454 views DOI Abstract
2017
preliminary experience and possible predictors of successful mirabegron treatment for overactive bladder
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 162-165
497 views DOI Abstract
2017
one step forward
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 57-
3 views DOI
2017
prostate inflammation: a brief review
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 113-118
208 views DOI Abstract
2017
laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy and open surgery
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 36-41
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
safety and efficacy of staged retrograde intrarenal surgery for large stone burden of renal stones in selected patients: a single-center experience
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 94-96
158 views DOI Abstract
2017
moving ahead
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 189-
4 views DOI
2017
clomiphene citrate treatment outcomes in taiwanese hypogonadal men: a single-center preliminary report
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 50-52
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
nephron-sparing management (distal ureterectomy with reimplantation of ureter) for carcinoma of distal ureter: a single-center experience
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 206-209
73 views DOI Abstract
2016
evolution of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in treatment of erectile dysfunction in taiwan
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 66-70
233 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.