Indexed in Journament

journal of social intervention: theory and practice

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,467 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
22 Articles
Scores higher than 16.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of social intervention: theory and practice
Abbreviated Name journal of social intervention: theory and practice

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 27.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 65.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of social intervention: theory and practice
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 27.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 65.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2010
de l’intertextualité dans la presse francophone en roumanie - etude de cas
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 49-58
367 views Abstract
2017
le mysticisme du livre
Vol. 2 , No. 24 , pp. 221-228
354 views Abstract
2014
discursivité et non-discursivité dans la structure logo-iconique lexicale de souche chrétienne
Vol. 1 , No. 17 , pp. 137-145
347 views Abstract
2014
pouvoir et idéologie dans les médias
Vol. 1 , No. 17 , pp. 111-124
339 views Abstract
2014
la syntaxe poétique – une syntaxe de la langue
Vol. 1 , No. 17 , pp. 202-204
328 views Abstract
2005
De gevarieerde samenleving. Over gelijkwaardigheid en diversiteit.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 46-50
326 views
2017
Verhaal achter vrijwilligerstoerisme
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 70-82
301 views Abstract
2018
de la contrefaçon onomastique des noms de marques à lubumbashi
Vol. 1 , No. 25 , pp. 213-218
203 views Abstract
2017
l’activité scientifique du cadiss en 2016 entre projets et réussites
Vol. 1 , No. 23 , pp. 195-199
146 views
2017
le mysticisme du livre
Vol. 2 , No. 24 , pp. 221-228
354 views Abstract
2017
Verhaal achter vrijwilligerstoerisme
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 70-82
301 views Abstract
2015
presentation
Vol. 1 , No. 19 , pp. 9-10
160 views
2015
pourquoi la langue et les études françaises dans le monde?
Vol. 1 , No. 19 , pp. 34-46
116 views Abstract
2015
la francophilophonie roumaine - un projet de cœur
Vol. 1 , No. 19 , pp. 241-242
202 views Abstract
2015
le discours médiatique roumain de la perspective de l’imaginaire linguistique
Vol. 1 , No. 19 , pp. 233-235
148 views Abstract
2014
pouvoir et idéologie dans les médias
Vol. 1 , No. 17 , pp. 111-124
339 views Abstract
2014
typologie des pouvoirs du fכkye d’anyama et leurs manifestations ideologico-humanistes
Vol. 1 , No. 17 , pp. 15-37
26 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,467 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

27.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.