Indexed in Journament

bmc international health and human rights

ISSN 1472-698X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #442 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 98.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bmc int health hum rights
Abbreviated Name bmc int health hum rights
ISSN 1472-698X
URL https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bmc international health and human rights
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 80.0 3.0
Diversity 83.3 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 5.5
Content Distribution 26.6 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2014
Female Genital Cutting (FGC) and the ethics of care: community engagement and cultural sensitivity at the interface of migration experiences.
Vol. 14 , pp. 13
511 views DOI Abstract
2019
Studying the impoverishing effects of procuring medicines: a national study.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 23
486 views DOI Abstract
2018
Examination of the roles and capacities of duty bearers responsible for protecting the human rights to adequate food, nutritional health and wellbeing in Ugandan children's homes.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 17
486 views DOI Abstract
2018
Factors shaping political priorities for violence against women-mitigation policies in Sri Lanka.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 22
446 views DOI Abstract
2016
Human rights dimensions of food, health and care in children's homes in Kampala, Uganda - a qualitative study.
Vol. 16 , pp. 10
405 views DOI Abstract
2018
Missing knowledge of gendered power relations among non-governmental organisations doing right to health work: a case study from South Africa.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 33
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: a qualitative study.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 3
387 views DOI Abstract
2026
An exploratory study to describe the growth and neurodevelopmental status of low birthweight infants in the context of a community-based mother-to-mother peer support implementation program in Kenya
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Navigating the climate–health nexus: an interest-holder analysis of the public health gaps in Uganda’s climate response
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Vision-related quality of life in glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration patients from a middle-income country
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Post-intervention outcomes 4 years after a nationwide postpartum haemorrhage mortality reduction project in Niger’s health facilities: a retrospective analysis
35 views DOI Abstract
2026
Use of complementary indicators in trachoma surveys in Nigeria: results of impact surveys in two local government areas
37 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #442 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

83.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

26.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.