Indexed in Journament

north carolina medical journal

ISSN 0029-2559· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.5/100
Journament Score
#2,118
Journament Rank
24
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name n c med j
Abbreviated Name n c med j
ISSN 0029-2559
URL http://www.ncmedicaljournal.com/archives/?improving-population-health

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2016
Responding to a Community's Concern: A Comparison of Breast Cancer Characteristics and Initial Treatment in Three Selected North Carolina Counties.
Vol. 78 , No. 6 , pp. 357-365
400 views DOI Abstract
Benefits, Pitfalls, and Potential Bias in Health Care AI.
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 219-223
398 views DOI Abstract
Characteristics and Delivery of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments in North Carolina.
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 261-268
397 views DOI Abstract
2014
chronic low dose rate ionizing radiation exposure induces premature senescence in human fibroblasts that correlates with up regulation of proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 341-362
386 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of post-translational modifications of crop proteins under abiotic stress
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 42-
383 views DOI Abstract
Bias in Artificial Intelligence.
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 220-222
382 views DOI
2016
omics approaches for the study of adaptive immunity to staphylococcus aureus and the selection of vaccine candidates
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
372 views DOI Abstract
2016
advances of salivary proteomics in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc) detection: an update
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 41-
350 views DOI Abstract
Health Status and Access to Care for the North Carolina Medicaid Gap Population.
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 269-275
337 views DOI Abstract
2018
the secretome and n-glycosylation profiles of the charophycean green alga, penium margaritaceum, resemble those of embryophytes
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 14-
253 views DOI Abstract
2016
mass spectrometric immunoassays in characterization of clinically significant proteoforms
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of post-translational modifications of crop proteins under abiotic stress
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 42-
383 views DOI Abstract
2016
age- and activity-related differences in the abundance of myosin essential and regulatory light chains in human muscle
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 15-
119 views DOI Abstract
2016
omics approaches for the study of adaptive immunity to staphylococcus aureus and the selection of vaccine candidates
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
372 views DOI Abstract
2016
advances of salivary proteomics in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc) detection: an update
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 41-
350 views DOI Abstract
2016
2015
concurrent label-free mass spectrometric analysis of dystrophin isoform dp427 and the myofibrosis marker collagen in crude extracts from mdx-4cv skeletal muscles
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 298-327
294 views DOI Abstract
2015
proteomic profiling of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells after a whole body exposure of cba/caj mice to titanium (48ti) ions
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 132-159
246 views DOI Abstract
2015
the cytosolic oligosaccharide-degrading proteome of butyrivibrio proteoclasticus
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 347-368
296 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.