north carolina medical journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#167 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

north carolina medical journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name n c med j
Abbreviated Name n c med j
ISSN 0029-2559
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2016
identification of abiotic stress protein biomarkers by proteomic screening of crop cultivar diversity
;Bronwyn J. Barkla
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 26-
345 views DOI Abstract
Benefits, Pitfalls, and Potential Bias in Health Care AI.
Hague, Douglas C;
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 219-223
340 views DOI Abstract
Responding to a Community's Concern: A Comparison of Breast Cancer Characteristics and Initial Treatment in Three Selected North Carolina Counties.
Vines, Anissa I;Carpenter, William R;Chen, Ronald C;Cherry, Michele W;Long, Debra G;Amos, Keith D;Godley, Paul A;
Vol. 78 , No. 6 , pp. 357-365
332 views DOI Abstract
Bias in Artificial Intelligence.
Nelson, Gregory S;
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 220-222
325 views DOI
2016
omics approaches for the study of adaptive immunity to staphylococcus aureus and the selection of vaccine candidates
;Silva Holtfreter;Julia Kolata;Sebastian Stentzel;Stephanie Bauerfeind;Frank Schmidt;Nandakumar Sundaramoorthy;Barbara M. Bröker
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
322 views DOI Abstract
2014
chronic low dose rate ionizing radiation exposure induces premature senescence in human fibroblasts that correlates with up regulation of proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress
;Olga Loseva;Emman Shubbar;Siamak Haghdoost;Bastiaan Evers;Thomas Helleday;Mats Harms-Ringdahl
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 341-362
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of post-translational modifications of crop proteins under abiotic stress
;Akiko Hashiguchi;Setsuko Komatsu
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 42-
313 views DOI Abstract
Characteristics and Delivery of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments in North Carolina.
Drake, Connor;Kirk, Julienne K;Buse, John B;Edelman, David;Shea, Christopher M;Spratt, Susan;Young, Laura A;Kahkoska, Anna R;
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 261-268
305 views DOI Abstract
Health Status and Access to Care for the North Carolina Medicaid Gap Population.
Spencer, Jennifer C;Gertner, Alex K;Silberman, Pam J;
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 269-275
277 views DOI Abstract
2016
advances of salivary proteomics in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc) detection: an update
;Rabia Sannam Khan;Zohaib Khurshid;Shazia Akhbar;Syed Faraz Moin
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 41-
272 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.