Indexed in Journament

north carolina medical journal

ISSN 0029-2559· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,040 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 31.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name n c med j
Abbreviated Name n c med j
ISSN 0029-2559
URL http://www.ncmedicaljournal.com/archives/?improving-population-health

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 7.9 11.5
Content Distribution 78.3 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2016
identification of abiotic stress protein biomarkers by proteomic screening of crop cultivar diversity
;Bronwyn J. Barkla
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 26-
422 views DOI Abstract
Characteristics and Delivery of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments in North Carolina.
Drake, Connor;Kirk, Julienne K;Buse, John B;Edelman, David;Shea, Christopher M;Spratt, Susan;Young, Laura A;Kahkoska, Anna R;
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 261-268
421 views DOI Abstract
Responding to a Community's Concern: A Comparison of Breast Cancer Characteristics and Initial Treatment in Three Selected North Carolina Counties.
Vines, Anissa I;Carpenter, William R;Chen, Ronald C;Cherry, Michele W;Long, Debra G;Amos, Keith D;Godley, Paul A;
Vol. 78 , No. 6 , pp. 357-365
419 views DOI Abstract
Benefits, Pitfalls, and Potential Bias in Health Care AI.
Hague, Douglas C;
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 219-223
409 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of post-translational modifications of crop proteins under abiotic stress
;Akiko Hashiguchi;Setsuko Komatsu
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 42-
401 views DOI Abstract
2014
chronic low dose rate ionizing radiation exposure induces premature senescence in human fibroblasts that correlates with up regulation of proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress
;Olga Loseva;Emman Shubbar;Siamak Haghdoost;Bastiaan Evers;Thomas Helleday;Mats Harms-Ringdahl
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 341-362
400 views DOI Abstract
Bias in Artificial Intelligence.
Nelson, Gregory S;
Vol. 80 , No. 4 , pp. 220-222
400 views DOI
2016
omics approaches for the study of adaptive immunity to staphylococcus aureus and the selection of vaccine candidates
;Silva Holtfreter;Julia Kolata;Sebastian Stentzel;Stephanie Bauerfeind;Frank Schmidt;Nandakumar Sundaramoorthy;Barbara M. Bröker
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
391 views DOI Abstract
2016
advances of salivary proteomics in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc) detection: an update
;Rabia Sannam Khan;Zohaib Khurshid;Shazia Akhbar;Syed Faraz Moin
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 41-
370 views DOI Abstract
Health Status and Access to Care for the North Carolina Medicaid Gap Population.
Spencer, Jennifer C;Gertner, Alex K;Silberman, Pam J;
Vol. 80 , No. 5 , pp. 269-275
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
the secretome and n-glycosylation profiles of the charophycean green alga, penium margaritaceum, resemble those of embryophytes
;Eliel Ruiz-May;Iben Sørensen;Zhangjun Fei;Sheng Zhang;David S. Domozych;Jocelyn K. C. Rose
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 14-
267 views DOI Abstract
2016
mass spectrometric immunoassays in characterization of clinically significant proteoforms
;Olgica Trenchevska;Randall W. Nelson;Dobrin Nedelkov
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
269 views DOI Abstract
2016
impact of post-translational modifications of crop proteins under abiotic stress
;Akiko Hashiguchi;Setsuko Komatsu
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 42-
401 views DOI Abstract
2016
age- and activity-related differences in the abundance of myosin essential and regulatory light chains in human muscle
;James N. Cobley;Zulezwan Ab. Malik;James P. Morton;Graeme L. Close;Ben J. Edwards;Jatin G. Burniston
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 15-
130 views DOI Abstract
2016
omics approaches for the study of adaptive immunity to staphylococcus aureus and the selection of vaccine candidates
;Silva Holtfreter;Julia Kolata;Sebastian Stentzel;Stephanie Bauerfeind;Frank Schmidt;Nandakumar Sundaramoorthy;Barbara M. Bröker
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
391 views DOI Abstract
2016
advances of salivary proteomics in oral squamous cell carcinoma (oscc) detection: an update
;Rabia Sannam Khan;Zohaib Khurshid;Shazia Akhbar;Syed Faraz Moin
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 41-
370 views DOI Abstract
2016
identification of abiotic stress protein biomarkers by proteomic screening of crop cultivar diversity
;Bronwyn J. Barkla
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 26-
422 views DOI Abstract
2015
concurrent label-free mass spectrometric analysis of dystrophin isoform dp427 and the myofibrosis marker collagen in crude extracts from mdx-4cv skeletal muscles
;Sandra Murphy;Margit Zweyer;Rustam R. Mundegar;Michael Henry;Paula Meleady;Dieter Swandulla;Kay Ohlendieck
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 298-327
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
proteomic profiling of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells after a whole body exposure of cba/caj mice to titanium (48ti) ions
;Kanokporn Noy Rithidech;Montree Tungjai;Witawat Jangiam;Louise Honikel;Chris Gordon;Xianyin Lai;Frank Witzmann
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 132-159
265 views DOI Abstract
2015
the cytosolic oligosaccharide-degrading proteome of butyrivibrio proteoclasticus
;Jonathan C. Dunne;William J. Kelly;Sinead C. Leahy;Dong Li;Judy J. Bond;Lifeng Peng;Graeme T. Attwood;T. William Jordan
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 347-368
314 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,040 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

78.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.