anali mečnikìvsʹkogo institutu | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2654 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

anali mečnikìvsʹkogo institutu

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name anali mečnikìvsʹkogo institutu
Abbreviated Name anali mečnikìvsʹkogo institutu
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2015
the measurement of hardness and elastic modulus of non-metallic inclusions in steely welding joints
;Ignatova Anna;Ignatov Mikhail
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 314-318
324 views Abstract
2014
managing service quality to gain competitive advantage in retail environment
;Sandra Jelcic
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 181-186
320 views Abstract
2015
RECOVERY IN VIVO OF NONCULTURABLE SUBPOPULATION OF SALMONELLA ENTERICA
I.P., Yudin;
Vol. 4 , pp. 82-85
288 views Abstract
2014
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF [1,2,4]TRIAZOLO[4,3-а]PYRAZIN-8(7H)-ONE DERIVATIVES
Yu., Kulikovska K.;G., Drushlyak O.;O., Zhuravel I.;M., Kovalenko S.;S., Kovalenko S.;
Vol. 4 , pp. 32-38
282 views Abstract
2014
EFFECT OF CYTOKINE CEREBROPROTECITON ON THE STATE OF ANTIOXIDANT THIOL-DISULFIDE SYSTEM IN THE BRAIN TISSUE OF RATS WITH EXPERIMENTAL DIABETES MELLITUS
E.V, Suprun;N.A, But;A.S, Suprun;
Vol. 3 , pp. 34-39
281 views Abstract
2018
the effectivity of authentic assessment based character education evaluation model
;Abd Azis Karim;Amir Abduh;Darman Manda;Muhammad Yunus
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 495-500
273 views DOI Abstract
2015
electrolysers powered with solar energy
;Ivaylo Y. Nedelchev;Rosen N. Vasilev
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 276-280
255 views Abstract
2017
developing materials for english for specific purposes online course within the blended learning concept
;Rimma Bielousova
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 637-642
251 views DOI Abstract
2014
stratified charge flame ignite in a gasoline engine conform to the engine operating regimes of indicator of combustion characteristics and burn time and their empirical equations
; Hanlar Bagirov;Ibrahim Can;Abdullah Kapicioglu
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 55-58
247 views Abstract
2014
application of the scoring model for assessing the credit rating of principals
;Margarita Janeska;Suzana Taleska;Kosta Sotiroski
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 50-54
237 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.