seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#479 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 11 hours ago

seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name semin thorac cardiovasc surg
Abbreviated Name semin thorac cardiovasc surg
ISSN 1532-9488
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Multiscale Modeling of Superior Cavopulmonary Circulation: Hemi-Fontan And Bidirectional Glenn Are Equivalent.
Kung, Ethan;Corsini, Chiara;Marsden, Alison;Vignon-Clementel, Irene;Pennati, Giancarlo;Figliola, Richard;Hsia, Tain-Yen;, ;
241 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial Intelligence in Aortic Surgery: The Rise of the Machine.
Bashir, Mohamad;Harky, Amer;
209 views DOI
2019
Left Ventricle to Right Atrial Shunt Associated with Ventricular-Atrial Malalignment, Double Outlet Right Atrium, and Subaortic Membrane.
Guenther, Timothy;Godoy, Luis;Chen, Sarah;Yeh, Jay;Raff, Gary;
206 views DOI Abstract
2013
consideraciones críticas sobre el modelo de alexander v. chayanov
;Josefina Liendo
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
184 views Abstract
2014
the eschatological opponent of daniel and the antichrist of the syriac apocalypse of daniel
;Sara Daiane Silva José
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
157 views Abstract
2014
reseña de toner, j. (2012) sesenta millones de romanos. la cultura del pueblo en la antigua roma. barcelona: crítica. traducción de luis noriega, título original, popular culture in ancient rome. cambridge: polity press, 2009, pp. 363.
;Juan Manuel Gerardi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
155 views Abstract
2013
the relations of exchange between northeast africa and levant (ca.3400 - 3000 a.c.)
;Carolina Quintana
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
140 views Abstract
2016
hybridization, ethnicity and cultural exchange in the early ptolemaic egypt (s. iv-iii a.c.)
;Agustín Ezequiel Saade
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e011-e011
129 views Abstract
2010
el ordo ad dandam poenitentiam del abad regino de prüm
;Analía Sapere;Andrea Vanina Neyra
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
128 views Abstract
2011
maíllo salgado, f. [2011]. acerca de la conquista árabe de hispania. imprecisiones, equívocos y patrañas. gijón: editorial trea. [bibliotheca arabo-románica et islámica], 175 páginas
;Jonatan Gastón García
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. -
120 views
View All 16 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.