Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#609 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Abbreviated Name j cancer res clin oncol
ISSN 1432-1335
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/432
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
CD44 splice variant (CD44v3) promotes progression of urothelial carcinoma of bladder through Akt/ERK/STAT3 pathways: novel therapeutic approach.
Anand, Vivek;Khandelwal, Madhuram;Appunni, Sandeep;Gupta, Nidhi;Seth, Amlesh;Singh, Prabhjot;Mathur, Sandeep;Sharma, Alpana;
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel panel of stool-based DNA biomarkers for early screening of colorectal neoplasms in a Chinese population.
Sun, Minghao;Liu, Jie;Hu, Hao;Guo, Peng;Shan, Zhili;Yang, Hengying;Wang, Junyi;Xiao, Wen;Zhou, Xiaojun;
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cancer patients and music: (prospective) results from a survey to evaluate potential complementary treatment approaches.
Gencer, Deniz;Diel, Alina;Klotzbach, Katharina;Christians, Kathrin;Rauch, Matthias;Meissner, Rosa;Weiß, Christel;Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten;Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter;
Vol. 145 , No. 8 , pp. 2141-2148
320 views DOI Abstract
2012
The roles of surgery and EMA/CO chemotherapy regimen in primary refractory and non-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Aydiner, Adnan;Keskin, Serkan;Berkman, Sinan;Bengisu, Ergin;Ilhan, Huseyin Ridvan;Tas, Faruk;Topuz, Erkan;
Vol. 138 , No. 6 , pp. 971-7
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expression and clinical significance of PD-L1 and c-Myc in non-small cell lung cancer.
Zhou, Cuiling;Che, Gang;Zheng, Xiaobin;Qiu, Junlan;Xie, Zhinan;Cong, Yunyan;Pei, Xiaofeng;Zhang, Hongyu;Sun, Huanhuan;Ma, Haiqing;
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
The efficacy of a coordinated pharmacological blockade in glioblastoma stem cells with nine repurposed drugs using the CUSP9 strategy.
Skaga, Erlend;Skaga, Ida Ø;Grieg, Zanina;Sandberg, Cecilie J;Langmoen, Iver A;Vik-Mo, Einar O;
Vol. 145 , No. 6 , pp. 1495-1507
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
Radiomic profiles in diffuse glioma reveal distinct subtypes with prognostic value.
Lin, Peng;Peng, Yu-Ting;Gao, Rui-Zhi;Wei, Yan;Li, Xiao-Jiao;Huang, Su-Ning;Fang, Ye-Ying;Wei, Zhu-Xin;Huang, Zhi-Guang;Yang, Hong;Chen, Gang;
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
análisis descriptivo de la dinámica del mercado laboral por edades en venezuela: 1997-2012
;Mayra Montilla
Vol. 01-2016 , No. 05 , pp. -
285 views Abstract
2019
Synchronicity of genetic variants between primary sites and metastatic lymph nodes, and prognostic impact in nodal metastatic lung adenocarcinoma
Ito, M.
Vol. 145 , pp. 2325-2333
279 views DOI
2019
Protective effect of the “food-microorganism-SCFAs” axis on colorectal cancer: from basic research to practical application
Shuwen, H.
Vol. 145 , pp. 2169-2197
266 views DOI
View All 14 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.