journal of materials science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#212 / 33,798
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

journal of materials science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j mater sci
Abbreviated Name journal of materials science
ISSN 0022-2461
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

2019
Design and mechanistic understanding of graphene oxide reinforced zein nanocomposites with improved mechanical, barrier and thermal properties
Rouf, T.
Vol. 54 , pp. 12533-12552
358 views DOI
1970
Measurement of the hardness distribution in sapphire/NiAl composites using continuous indentation
D. E. Boss;D. E. Boss;
Vol. 33 , No. 16 , pp. 4101-4104
325 views DOI Abstract
2016
Conjugated microporous polymer-based carbazole derivatives as fluorescence chemosensors for picronitric acid
Geng T.
Vol. 51 , pp. 4104-4114
310 views DOI
2004
Measurement of residual stresses in Al 2 O 3 /Ni laminated composites using an X-ray diffraction technique
L. Hehn;C. Zheng;J. J. Mecholsky;C. R. Hubbard;L. Hehn;C. Zheng;J. J. Mecholsky;C. R. Hubbard;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 1277-1282
293 views DOI Abstract
1970
Microstructural aspects of crack propagation in ceramics
C. Cm. Wu;S. W. Freiman;R. W. Rice;J. J. Mecholsky;C. Cm. Wu;S. W. Freiman;R. W. Rice;J. J. Mecholsky;
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 2659-2670
288 views DOI Abstract
1993
The microhardness indentation load/size effect in rutile and cassiterite single crystals
H. Li;R. C. Bradt;H. Li;R. C. Bradt;
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 917-926
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of chemical reaction on the microstructure and mechanical properties of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) precursor fibers
Ge, Y.
Vol. 54 , pp. 12592-12604
268 views DOI
1970
The effect of binder thickness and residual stresses on the fracture toughness of cemented carbides
Raymond A. Cutler;Anil V. Virkar;Raymond A. Cutler;Anil V. Virkar;
Vol. 20 , No. 10 , pp. 3557-3573
253 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sub-ppm acetic acid gas sensor based on In<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> nanofibers
Wang, Y.
Vol. 54 , pp. 14055-14063
247 views DOI
2008
embodiment, multimodality, and composition: convergent themes across hci and education for mixed-reality learning environments
;David Birchfield;Harvey Thornburg;M. Colleen Megowan-Romanowicz;Sarah Hatton;Brandon Mechtley;Igor Dolgov;Winslow Burleson
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
View All 44 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.