Indexed in Journament

Journal of pain and symptom management

ISSN 1873-6513· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,655 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 60.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Pain Symptom Manage
Abbreviated Name journal of pain and symptom management
ISSN 1873-6513
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-pain-and-symptom-management

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 16.4 5.8
Content Distribution 79.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Natural Language Processing Accurately Measures Adherence to Best Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care in Trauma.
Lee, Katherine C;Udelsman, Brooks V;Streid, Jocelyn;Chang, David C;Salim, Ali;Livingston, David H;Lindvall, Charlotta;Cooper, Zara;
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs with End of Life Decisions.
Torke, Alexia M;D Min, George Fitchett;Maiko, Saneta;Burke, Emily S;Slaven, James E;Watson, Beth Newton;Ivy, Steven;Monahan, Patrick O;
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and Validation of the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9): A Measure of Patient Attitudes toward Palliative Care.
Perry, Laura M;Hoerger, Michael;Malhotra, Sonia;Gerhart, James I;Mohile, Supriya;Duberstein, Paul R;
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
A feasibility study to develop and test a cognitive behavioral stress management mobile health application for HIV-related fatigue.
Barroso, Julie;Madisetti, Mohan;Mueller, Martina;
431 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quality assessments of end-of-life care by medical record review for patients dying in intensive care units in Taiwan.
Lo, Mei-Ling;Huang, Chung-Chi;Hu, Tsung-Hui;Chou, Wen-Chi;Chuang, Li-Pang;Chiang, Ming Chu;Wen, Fur-Hsing;Tang, Siew Tzuh;
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Introduction to a New Special Series for the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management—Science in Action: Evidence and Opportunities for Palliative Care Across Diverse Populations and Care Settings
Aslakson, R.
Vol. 58 , pp. 134-136
421 views DOI
2019
Coping skills training and acceptance and commitment therapy for symptom management: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief telephone-delivered protocol for patients with advanced cancer.
Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C;Winger, Joseph G;Teo, Irene;Owen, Lynda;Sutton, Linda M;Keefe, Francis J;Somers, Tamara J;
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient-reported symptom severity among 22,650 cancer outpatients in the last 6 months of life.
Bubis, Lev D;Davis, Laura E;Canaj, Hera;Gupta, Vaibhav;Jeong, Yunni;Barbera, Lisa;Li, Qing;Moody, Lesley;Karanicolas, Paul J;Sutradhar, Rinku;Coburn, Natalie G;Mahar, Alyson L;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cancer Pain in People With Intellectual Disabilities: Systematic Review and Survey of Health Care Professionals.
Millard, Samantha K;de Knegt, Nanda C;
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout And Resilience after a Decade in Palliative Care (BARD): What 'Survivors' have to teach us. A Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Clinicians with more than 10 years of experience.
Koh Yh, Mervyn;Hum Ym, Allyn;Hwee Sing, Khoo;Ho Hy, Andy;Poh Heng, Chong;Wah Ying, Ong;Ong, Joseph;Neo Sh, Patricia;Woon Chai, Yong;
397 views DOI Abstract
2024
Should Cannabis be Used for Anorexia in Patients With Cancer?
Davis, Mellar;Cyr, Claude;Crawford, Gregory B;Case, Amy A;
75 views DOI Abstract
2020
Telemedicine in the Time of Coronavirus
Calton B;Abedini N;Fratkin M;;
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. -
267 views Abstract
2020
Quality assessments of end-of-life care by medical record review for patients dying in intensive care units in Taiwan.
Lo, Mei-Ling;Huang, Chung-Chi;Hu, Tsung-Hui;Chou, Wen-Chi;Chuang, Li-Pang;Chiang, Ming Chu;Wen, Fur-Hsing;Tang, Siew Tzuh;
426 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hyperactive Delirium Requires More Aggressive Management in Patients with COVID-19: Temporarily Rethinking "Low and Slow".
Sanders, Barton J;Bakar, Melissa;Mehta, Sonal;Reid, M Carrington;Siegler, Eugenia L;Abrams, Robert C;Adelman, Ronald D;Lachs, Mark S;
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Crisis Symptom Management and Patient Communication Protocols Are Important Tools for All Clinicians Responding to COVID-19.
Bowman, Brynn A;Esch, Andrew E;Back, Anthony L;Marshall, Nadine;
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
Triaging the Terminally Ill-Development of the Responding to Urgency of Need in Palliative Care (RUN-PC) Triage Tool.
Russell, Bethany;Vogrin, Sara;Philip, Jennifer;Hennessy-Anderson, Nicole;Collins, Anna;Burchell, Jodie;Le, Brian;Brand, Caroline;Hudson, Peter;Sundararajan, Vijaya;
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 95-104.e11
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout among Hospice and Palliative Care Clinicians in the US.
Kamal, Arif H;Bull, Janet H;Wolf, Steven P;Swetz, Keith M;Shanafelt, Tait D;Ast, Katherine;Kavalieratos, Dio;Sinclair, Christian T;
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cancer Pain in People With Intellectual Disabilities: Systematic Review and Survey of Health Care Professionals.
Millard, Samantha K;de Knegt, Nanda C;
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Natural Language Processing Accurately Measures Adherence to Best Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care in Trauma.
Lee, Katherine C;Udelsman, Brooks V;Streid, Jocelyn;Chang, David C;Salim, Ali;Livingston, David H;Lindvall, Charlotta;Cooper, Zara;
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping skills training and acceptance and commitment therapy for symptom management: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief telephone-delivered protocol for patients with advanced cancer.
Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C;Winger, Joseph G;Teo, Irene;Owen, Lynda;Sutton, Linda M;Keefe, Francis J;Somers, Tamara J;
420 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,655 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

16.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.