Indexed in Journament

Journal of pain and symptom management

ISSN 1873-6513· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.6/100
Journament Score
#1,796
Journament Rank
25
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name J Pain Symptom Manage
Abbreviated Name journal of pain and symptom management
ISSN 1873-6513
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-pain-and-symptom-management

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Natural Language Processing Accurately Measures Adherence to Best Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care in Trauma.
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and Validation of the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9): A Measure of Patient Attitudes toward Palliative Care.
408 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quality assessments of end-of-life care by medical record review for patients dying in intensive care units in Taiwan.
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs with End of Life Decisions.
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient-reported symptom severity among 22,650 cancer outpatients in the last 6 months of life.
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout And Resilience after a Decade in Palliative Care (BARD): What 'Survivors' have to teach us. A Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Clinicians with more than 10 years of experience.
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping skills training and acceptance and commitment therapy for symptom management: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief telephone-delivered protocol for patients with advanced cancer.
369 views DOI Abstract
2024
Should Cannabis be Used for Anorexia in Patients With Cancer?
47 views DOI Abstract
2020
Telemedicine in the Time of Coronavirus
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. -
238 views Abstract
2020
Quality assessments of end-of-life care by medical record review for patients dying in intensive care units in Taiwan.
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hyperactive Delirium Requires More Aggressive Management in Patients with COVID-19: Temporarily Rethinking "Low and Slow".
265 views DOI Abstract
2020
Crisis Symptom Management and Patient Communication Protocols Are Important Tools for All Clinicians Responding to COVID-19.
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Triaging the Terminally Ill-Development of the Responding to Urgency of Need in Palliative Care (RUN-PC) Triage Tool.
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 95-104.e11
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout among Hospice and Palliative Care Clinicians in the US.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Natural Language Processing Accurately Measures Adherence to Best Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care in Trauma.
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping skills training and acceptance and commitment therapy for symptom management: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief telephone-delivered protocol for patients with advanced cancer.
369 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.