The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs with End of Life Decisions.
Clicks: 448
ID: 48875
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
84.5
/100
448 views
289 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 25 articles by views in Journal of pain and symptom management
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Although religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life sustaining treatments.To determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates.This prospective, observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2-10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange 6 months after enrollment identified the use of life sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died.There were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for DNR status (Adjusted odds Ratio (aOR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66, CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30, CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70, CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization.Few religious variables are associated with end of life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.
| Reference Key |
torke2019thejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Torke, Alexia M;D Min, George Fitchett;Maiko, Saneta;Burke, Emily S;Slaven, James E;Watson, Beth Newton;Ivy, Steven;Monahan, Patrick O; |
| Journal | Journal of pain and symptom management |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0885-3924(19)30526-3
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.